bugfix: uniques did not contributed to MYI tot_length estimation, which...

bugfix: uniques did not contributed to MYI tot_length estimation, which resulted in "Index file full" error on huge SELECT DISTINCT's
parent a4384f85
......@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ int mi_create(const char *name,uint keys,MI_KEYDEF *keydefs,
if (uniques)
{
max_key_block_length= myisam_block_size;
max_key_length= MI_UNIQUE_HASH_LENGTH;
max_key_length= MI_UNIQUE_HASH_LENGTH;
}
for (i=0, keydef=keydefs ; i < keys ; i++ , keydef++)
......@@ -396,6 +396,9 @@ int mi_create(const char *name,uint keys,MI_KEYDEF *keydefs,
uniquedef->key=keys+i;
unique_key_parts+=uniquedef->keysegs;
share.state.key_root[keys+i]= HA_OFFSET_ERROR;
tot_length+= (max_rows/(ulong) (((uint) myisam_block_size-5)/
((MI_UNIQUE_HASH_LENGTH + pointer)*2)))*
(ulong) myisam_block_size;
}
keys+=uniques; /* Each unique has 1 key */
key_segs+=uniques; /* Each unique has 1 key seg */
......@@ -579,8 +582,8 @@ int mi_create(const char *name,uint keys,MI_KEYDEF *keydefs,
tmp_keydef.block_length= myisam_block_size;
tmp_keydef.keylength= MI_UNIQUE_HASH_LENGTH + pointer;
tmp_keydef.minlength=tmp_keydef.maxlength=tmp_keydef.keylength;
tmp_keyseg.type= MI_UNIQUE_HASH_TYPE;
tmp_keyseg.length= MI_UNIQUE_HASH_LENGTH;
tmp_keyseg.type= MI_UNIQUE_HASH_TYPE;
tmp_keyseg.length= MI_UNIQUE_HASH_LENGTH;
tmp_keyseg.start= offset;
offset+= MI_UNIQUE_HASH_LENGTH;
if (mi_keydef_write(file,&tmp_keydef) ||
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment