Merge bundle on mysql-5.5.

When a DML statement is issued, and if the index merge 
access method is chosen, then many rows from the
storage engine will be locked because of the way the
algorithm works.  Many rows will be locked, but they
will not be part of the final result set.

To reduce the excessive locking, the locks of unmatched
rows are released by this patch.  This patch will 
affect only transactions with isolation level
equal to or less stricter than READ COMMITTED. This is
because of the behaviour of ha_innobase::unlock_row().

rb://1296 approved by jorgen and olav.

Problem:-
When we execute a query which has subquery with GROUP BY, ORDER BY and have a
BLOB column,results a memory leak.

Analysis:-
In case of subquery, which have GROUP BY on BLOB and a ORDER BY on other field
and BLOB is not a key. We allocate a tmp buffer to copy_field to take care of
BLOB value.This copy_field value can have copies of its in two join(objects),
so while freeing this copy_field we have to take care that it is
not deleted twice.
The double deletion of tmp_table_param.copy_field is handled by two patches.

One by Kostja :
revid:sp1r-konstantin@mysql.com-20050627101056-55153
Fix the broken test suite in -debug build.

and other by Oleksandr
revid:sp1r-bell@sanja.is.com.ua-20060118114857-19905
Excluded posibility of tmp_table_param.copy_field double deletion (BUG#14851).

both of this patches are commited in different branch and while
merging they both get placed,but there is no need for Kostja patch as Oleksandr
patch handle this.

Problem:-
When we execute a query which has subquery with GROUP BY, ORDER BY and have a
BLOB column,results a memory leak.

Analysis:-
In case of subquery, which have GROUP BY on BLOB and a ORDER BY on other field
and BLOB is not a key. We allocate a tmp buffer to copy_field to take care of
BLOB value.This copy_field value can have copies of its in two join(objects),
so while freeing this copy_field we have to take care that it is
not deleted twice.
The double deletion of tmp_table_param.copy_field is handled by two patches.

One by Kostja :
revid:sp1r-konstantin@mysql.com-20050627101056-55153
Fix the broken test suite in -debug build.

and other by Oleksandr
revid:sp1r-bell@sanja.is.com.ua-20060118114857-19905
Excluded posibility of tmp_table_param.copy_field double deletion (BUG#14851).

both of this patches are commited in different branch and while
merging they both get placed,but there is no need for Kostja patch as Oleksandr
patch handle this.

LEN <= SIZEOF(ULONGLONG)

This bug was caught in the WL#6255 ALTER TABLE...ADD COLUMN in MySQL
5.6, but there is a bug in all InnoDB versions that support
auto-increment columns.

row_search_autoinc_read_column(): When reading the maximum value of
the auto-increment column, and the column only contains NULL values,
return 0. This corresponds to the case when the table is empty in
row_search_max_autoinc().

rb:1415 approved by Sunny Bains

removing .... will re-add using merge. for some reason initial mysql-5.1 version is not connected to mysql-5.5

mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable
$UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe.

Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe,
within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on
even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash
with a fancy symlink).

Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi
(in perl).

(backport)

rb://1334
approved by: Inaam Rana

mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable
$UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe.

Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe,
within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on
even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash
with a fancy symlink).

Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi
(in perl).

(backport)

manual merge

rb://1334
approved by: Inaam Rana

mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable
$UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe.

Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe,
within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on
even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash
with a fancy symlink).

Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi
(in perl).

Problem:-
using last_insert_id() on an auto_incremented bigint unsigned does
not work for values which are greater than max-bigint-signed.

Analysis:-
last_insert_id() returns the first auto_incremented value for a column
and an auto_incremented value can have only positive values.

In our code, when we are initializing a last_insert_id object, we are
taking it as a signed BIGINT, So when the auto_incremented value reaches
greater than max signed bigint, last_insert_id gives negative result.

Solution:
When we are fetching the value from last_insert_id, We are setting the 
unsigned_flag, so that it take only unsigned BIGINT value.

Problem:-
using last_insert_id() on an auto_incremented bigint unsigned does
not work for values which are greater than max-bigint-signed.

Analysis:-
last_insert_id() returns the first auto_incremented value for a column
and an auto_incremented value can have only positive values.

In our code, when we are initializing a last_insert_id object, we are
taking it as a signed BIGINT, So when the auto_incremented value reaches
greater than max signed bigint, last_insert_id gives negative result.

Solution:
When we are fetching the value from last_insert_id, We are setting the 
unsigned_flag, so that it take only unsigned BIGINT value.

No commit message

REAL DUPLICATE VALUE FOR PREFIX KEYS

innobase_rec_to_mysql(): Invoke dict_index_get_nth_col_or_prefix_pos()
instead of dict_index_get_nth_col_pos() to find the column.

removed warning message as they have changed in mysql-5.6 and mysql-trunk and this is left over from changes that got up-merged 

bug#14704286
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)

If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.

If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.

-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.

bug#14704286
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)

If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.

If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.

-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.

This fix resolves a security vulnerability of SHOW PROFILE.

See the bug report for details.

Merge from mysql-5.1 into mysql-5.5.

This bug had two problems:
 P1) Reads out of bounds;
 P2) Writes out of bounds.

PROBLEM P1
----------
User_var_log_event unmarshalling from binlog was not performing range
checks when using name_len and val_len variables to walk on event
buffer.

Added range checks to User_var_log_event unmarshalling to prevent
unmarshalling errors.

PROBLEM P2
----------
User_var_log_event value was allocated on thread stack, what caused
stack frame errors when User_var_log_event value was bigger than thread
stack size.

Currently value is allocated on heap memory.

exist in 5.5).

os/os0file.c:1332: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code

although the bug does not exist in 5.1/innodb.

The problem is in the error handling in row_create_table_for_mysql().
In the 'disk full' case we may forget to call dict_mem_table_free() on
the table object.

Approved by:	Marko (rb:1377 and rb:1386)

               PRIVILEGES

Description: (user,host) pair from security context is used
             privilege checking at the time of granting or
             revoking proxy privileges. This creates problem
             when server is started with
             --skip-name-resolve option because host will not
             contain any value. Checks should be dependent on
             consistent values regardless the way server is
             started. Further, privilege check should use
             (priv_user,priv_host) pair rather than values
             obtained from inbound connection because
             this pair represents the correct account context
             obtained from mysql.user table.

               FAILS TO READ EVENT TABLE AT STARTUP.

This issue is fixed in 5.5+ versions. This patch adds a test
case for this scenario.

CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT OPTION

A transaction is started with a consistent snapshot.  After 
the transaction is started new indexes are added to the 
table.  Now when we issue an update statement, the optimizer
chooses an index.  When the index scan is being initialized
via ha_innobase::change_active_index(), InnoDB reports 
the error code HA_ERR_TABLE_DEF_CHANGED, with message 
stating that "insufficient history for index".

This error message is propagated up to the SQL layer.  But
the my_error() api is never called.  The statement level
diagnostics area is not updated with the correct error 
status (it remains in Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY).  

Hence the following check in the Protocol::end_statement()
fails.

 516   case Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY:
 517   default:
 518     DBUG_ASSERT(0);
 519     error= send_ok(thd->server_status, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
 520     break;

The fix is to backport the fix of bugs 14365043, 11761652 
and 11746399. 

14365043 PROTOCOL::END_STATEMENT(): ASSERTION `0' FAILED
11761652 HA_RND_INIT() RESULT CODE NOT CHECKED
11746399 RETURN VALUES OF HA_INDEX_INIT() AND INDEX_INIT() IGNORED

rb://1227 approved by guilhem and mattiasj.