1. 27 May, 2011 5 commits
    • Bjorn Munch's avatar
      Bug #12598603 HAVE COLLECTIONS FILES IN FEATURE TREES AUTO-APPENDED TO COMMON FILES · 94f96bc4
      Bjorn Munch authored
      Do this in the common plugin.cmake but only if running in PB2
        (If done in manual builds it would create a bzr diff)
      94f96bc4
    • Dmitry Shulga's avatar
    • Tatjana Azundris Nuernberg's avatar
      20791d83
    • Dmitry Shulga's avatar
      Fixed bug#12546938 (formerly known as 61005) - CREATE IF NOT EXIST EVENT · 56a735b7
      Dmitry Shulga authored
      will create multiple running events.
      
      A CREATE IF NOT EXIST on an event that existed and was enabled caused
      multiple instances of the event to run. Disabling the event didn't  help.
      If the event was  dropped, the event stopped running, but when created
      again, multiple instances of the event were still running. The only way
      to get out of this situation was  to restart the server.
      
      The problem was that Event_db_repository::create_event() didn't return
      enough information to discriminate between situation when event didn't
      exist and was created and when event did exist and was not created
      (but a warning was emitted). As result in the latter case event
      was added to in-memory queue of events second time. And this led to
      unwarranted multiple executions of the same event.
      
      The solution is to add out-parameter to Event_db_repository::create_event()
      method which will signal that event was not created because it already
      exists and so it should not be added to the in-memory queue.
      
      
      mysql-test/r/events_bugs.result:
        Added results for test for Bug#12546938.
      mysql-test/t/events_bugs.test:
        Added test for Bug#12546938.
      sql/event_db_repository.cc:
        Event_db_repository::create_event was modified: set newly added out-parameter
        event_already_exists to true value if event wasn't created because event
        already existed and IF NOT EXIST clause was present.
      sql/event_db_repository.h:
        Added out-parameter 'event_already_exists' to create_event() method.
      sql/events.cc:
        Events::create_event was modified: insert new element into
        event queue only if event was actually created.
      56a735b7
    • Anitha Gopi's avatar
      Automerge : Updating local tree · 8ae716e9
      Anitha Gopi authored
      8ae716e9
  2. 26 May, 2011 11 commits
    • Dmitry Lenev's avatar
      Fix for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN · fecca343
      Dmitry Lenev authored
      HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
      
      Attempt to update an InnoDB temporary table under LOCK TABLES
      led to assertion failure in both debug and production builds
      if this temporary table was explicitly locked for READ. The
      same scenario works fine for MyISAM temporary tables.
      
      The assertion failure was caused by discrepancy between lock
      that was requested on the rows of temporary table at LOCK TABLES
      time and by update operation. Since SQL-layer requested a
      read-lock at LOCK TABLES time InnoDB engine assumed that upcoming
      statements which are going to be executed under LOCK TABLES will
      only read table and therefore should acquire only S-lock.
      An update operation broken this assumption by requesting X-lock.
      
      Possible approaches to fixing this problem are:
      
      1) Skip locking of temporary tables as locking doesn't make any
         sense for connection-local objects.
      2) Prohibit changing of temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES ...
         READ.
      
      Unfortunately both of these approaches have drawbacks which make
      them unviable for stable versions of server.
      
      So this patch takes another approach and changes code in such way
      that LOCK TABLES for a temporary table will always request write
      lock. In 5.5 version of this patch switch from read lock to write
      lock is done on SQL-layer.
      
      mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_mysql.result:
        Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
        HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
      mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_mysql.test:
        Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
        HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
      sql/sql_parse.cc:
        Since a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated even
        if it was only locked for read we always request TL_WRITE locks
        for such tables at LOCK TABLES time. This allows to avoid 
        discrepancy between locks acquired at LOCK TABLES time and by
        a statement executed under LOCK TABLES. Such a discrepancy has
        caused problems for InnoDB storage engine.
        
        To support this change a part of code implementing LOCK TABLES 
        has been moved to a helper function.
      fecca343
    • Dmitry Lenev's avatar
      Null-merged 5.1 version of fix for bug #11762012 - "54553: · 1db26385
      Dmitry Lenev authored
      INNODB ASSERTS IN HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE,
      TABLE LOCK" into 5.5 tree. 5.5 version of fix will be
      committed and pushed separately.
      1db26385
    • Dmitry Lenev's avatar
      Fix for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN · 861291f1
      Dmitry Lenev authored
      HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
      
      Attempt to update an InnoDB temporary table under LOCK TABLES
      led to assertion failure in both debug and production builds
      if this temporary table was explicitly locked for READ. The 
      same scenario works fine for MyISAM temporary tables.
      
      The assertion failure was caused by discrepancy between lock 
      that was requested on the rows of temporary table at LOCK TABLES
      time and by update operation. Since SQL-layer requested a 
      read-lock at LOCK TABLES time InnoDB engine assumed that upcoming
      statements which are going to be executed under LOCK TABLES will 
      only read table and therefore should acquire only S-lock.
      An update operation broken this assumption by requesting X-lock.
      
      Possible approaches to fixing this problem are:
      
      1) Skip locking of temporary tables as locking doesn't make any
         sense for connection-local objects.
      2) Prohibit changing of temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES ... 
         READ.
      
      Unfortunately both of these approaches have drawbacks which make 
      them unviable for stable versions of server.
      
      So this patch takes another approach and changes code in such way
      that LOCK TABLES for a temporary table will always request write
      lock. In 5.1 version of this patch switch from read lock to write
      lock is done inside of InnoDBs handler methods as doing it on 
      SQL-layer causes compatibility troubles with FLUSH TABLES WITH
      READ LOCK.
      
      mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_mysql.result:
        Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN 
        HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
      mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_mysql.test:
        Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN 
        HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
      mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/r/innodb_mysql.result:
        Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN 
        HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
      mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/t/innodb_mysql.test:
        Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN 
        HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
      storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
        Assume that a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated
        even if it was only locked for read and therefore an X-lock should 
        be always requested for such tables.
      storage/innodb_plugin/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
        Assume that a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated
        even if it was only locked for read and therefore an X-lock should 
        be always requested for such tables.
      861291f1
    • Tatjana Azundris Nuernberg's avatar
      auto-merge Bug#11745920 · e1b79597
      Tatjana Azundris Nuernberg authored
      e1b79597
    • Sven Sandberg's avatar
      Merged BUG#12574820 from 5.1 to 5.5 · add86aad
      Sven Sandberg authored
      Two conflicts resolved manually:
      Text conflict in sql/log.cc
      Text conflict in sql/mysqld.cc
      add86aad
    • Sven Sandberg's avatar
      BUG#12574820: binlog.binlog_tmp_table timing out in daily and weekly trunk run · de377681
      Sven Sandberg authored
      Problem: MYSQL_BIN_LOG::reset_logs acquires mutexes in wrong order.
      The correct order is first LOCK_thread_count and then LOCK_log. This function
      does it the other way around. This leads to deadlock when run in parallel
      with a thread that takes the two locks in correct order. For example, a thread
      that disconnects will take the locks in the correct order.
      Fix: change order of the locks in MYSQL_BIN_LOG::reset_logs:
      first LOCK_thread_count and then LOCK_log.
      
      
      mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_reset_master.result:
        added result file
      mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_reset_master.test:
        Added test case that demonstrates deadlock because of wrong mutex order.
        The deadlock is between two threads:
         - RESET MASTER acquires mutexes in wrong order.
         - client thread shutdown code acquires mutexes in right order.
        Actually, this test case does not produce deadlock in 5.1, probably
        the client thread shutdown code does not hold both mutexes at the same
        time. However, the bug existed in 5.1 (mutexes are taken in the wrong
        order) so we push the test case to 5.1 too, to prevent future
        regressions.
      sql/log.cc:
        Change mutex acquisition to the correct order:
        first LOCK_thread_count, then LOCK_log.
      sql/mysqld.cc:
        Add debug code to synchronize test case.
      de377681
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      5.1 -> 5.5 merge · 9d42d36e
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      9d42d36e
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      Bug#12392636 ASSERTION FAILED: SCALE >= 0 && PRECISION > 0 && SCALE <= PRECISION · 3efbf304
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      Assertion happens due to missing NULL value check in
      Item_func_round::fix_length_and_dec() function.
      The fix: added NULL value check for second parameter.
      
      
      mysql-test/r/func_math.result:
        test case
      mysql-test/t/func_math.test:
        test case
      sql/item_func.cc:
        added NULL value check for second parameter.
      3efbf304
    • Bjorn Munch's avatar
      merge from 5.5-mtr · b5009ee6
      Bjorn Munch authored
      b5009ee6
    • Tor Didriksen's avatar
      Don't check for FIONREAD on windows. · c41e8663
      Tor Didriksen authored
      Execution of platforms tests are slow/flaky when building on windows.
      in PB:mysql-next-mr-opt-team on 2011-05-18 for win x86 debug_max, i see:
      -- Looking for FIONREAD
      -- Looking for FIONREAD - found
      and the build fails.
      c41e8663
    • Anitha Gopi's avatar
  3. 25 May, 2011 8 commits
  4. 24 May, 2011 15 commits
  5. 23 May, 2011 1 commit
    • Luis Soares's avatar
      BUG#12558519 · 79f8d024
      Luis Soares authored
      Automerged bzr bundle from bug report into latest mysql-5.5.
      79f8d024