Details:
 - Archive storage engine file access were not instrumented and thus
   were not shown in PS tables.
      
Fix:
 - Added instrumentation code by using PS Apis for I/O.

rb://1088
approved by: Marko Makela

This bug was introduced in early stages of plugin. We were not
checking for an implicit lock on sec index rec for trx_id that is
stamped on current version of the clust_index in case where the
clust_index has a previous delete marked version.

IN THE ERROR LOG
      
Problem:
Using mysqlbinlog with the --read-from-remote-server option as shown below
prints a message in error log for each call. This happens for 5.5 and above
versions
      
mysqlbinlog -uroot -p --read-from-remote-server --host=localhost test
      
Message in error log file is given below:
120312 10:27:57 [Note] Start binlog_dump to slave_server(0), pos(test, 4)
      
The problem is that it can fill up the error log if the command is called
very often.
      
Analysis:
The below mentioned print function is called from "mysql_binlog_send" function
which causes the "Start binlog_dump..." string to be printed in error log file.

sql_print_information("Start binlog_dump to master_thread_id(%lu) 
slave_server(%d)..."
      
Fix:
A condition has been added in such a way that the 'sql_print_information' 
will be invoked only when the "log_warnings" variable is set to >1 
otherwise don't call the 'sql_print_information' function.

Print deprecation warning if the --safe-mode command line option is
used.

so that investigating test failures is easier.

Detect cases when @before_count / @after_count is NULL.

updating the result file.  Because a multi-row insert now reserves the
auto increment values before hand, if any explicitly specified auto
increment values are there, then some of the reserved values are lost.

INNODB_AUTOINC_LOCK_MODE=1 AND USING TRIGGER

When an insert stmt like "insert into t values (1),(2),(3)" is
executed, the autoincrement values assigned to these three rows are
expected to be contiguous.  In the given lock mode
(innodb_autoinc_lock_mode=1), the auto inc lock will be released
before the end of the statement.  So to make the autoincrement
contiguous for a given statement, we need to reserve the auto inc
values at the beginning of the statement.  

Modified the fix based on review comment by Svoj.  

This is a followup to the fix for Bug#12340997
get_interval_value() was trying to parse the input string,
looking for leading '-' while skipping whitespace.
The macro my_isspace() does not work for utf32 character set,
since my_charset_utf32_general_ci.ctype == NULL.

Solution: convert input to ASCII before parsing,
and use the character set of the returned ASCII string.

      
Problem: After the fix for Bug#12589870, a new field that
stores the length of db name was added in the buffer that
stores the query to be executed. Unlike for the plain user
session, the replication execution did not allocate the
necessary chunk in Query-event constructor. This caused an
invalid read while accessing this field.
      
Solution: We fix this problem by allocating a necessary chunk
in the buffer created in the Query_log_event::Query_log_event()
and store the length of database name.

PROBLEM:
Threads end-up in deadlock due to locks acquired as described
below,

con1: Run Query on a table. 
  It is important that this SELECT must back-off while
  trying to open the t1 and enter into wait_for_condition().
  The SELECT then is blocked trying to lock mysys_var->mutex
  which is held by con3. The very significant fact here is
  that mysys_var->current_mutex will still point to LOCK_open,
  even if LOCK_open is no longer held by con1 at this point.

con2: Try dropping table used in con1 or query some table.
  It will hold LOCK_open and be blocked trying to lock
  kernel_mutex held by con4.

con3: Try killing the query run by con1.
  It will hold THD::LOCK_thd_data belonging to con1 while
  trying to lock mysys_var->current_mutex belonging to con1.
  But current_mutex will point to LOCK_open which is held
  by con2.

con4: Get innodb engine status
  It will hold kernel_mutex, trying to lock THD::LOCK_thd_data
  belonging to con1 which is held by con3.

So while technically only con2, con3 and con4 participate in the
deadlock, con1's mysys_var->current_mutex pointing to LOCK_open
is a vital component of the deadlock.

CYCLE = (THD::LOCK_thd_data -> LOCK_open ->
         kernel_mutex -> THD::LOCK_thd_data)

FIX:
LOCK_thd_data has responsibility of protecting,
1) thd->query, thd->query_length
2) VIO
3) thd->mysys_var (used by KILL statement and shutdown)
4) THD during thread delete.

Among above responsibilities, 1), 2)and (3,4) seems to be three
independent group of responsibility. If there is different LOCK
owning responsibility of (3,4), the above mentioned deadlock cycle
can be avoid. This fix introduces LOCK_thd_kill to handle
responsibility (3,4), which eliminates the deadlock issue.

Note: The problem is not found in 5.5. Introduction MDL subsystem 
caused metadata locking responsibility to be moved from TDC/TC to
MDL subsystem. Due to this, responsibility of LOCK_open is reduced. 
As the use of LOCK_open is removed in open_table() and 
mysql_rm_table() the above mentioned CYCLE does not form.
Revision ID for changes,
open_table() = dlenev@mysql.com-20100727133458-m3ua9oslnx8fbbvz
mysql_rm_table() = jon.hauglid@oracle.com-20101116100012-kxep9txz2fxy3nmw

No commit message

No commit message

The following scenario crashes our mysql server:

1.  set global innodb_file_per_table=1;
2.  create table t1(c1 int) engine=innodb;
3.  alter table t1 discard tablespace;
4.  alter table t1 add unique index(c1);

Step 4 crashes the server.  This patch introduces a check on discarded
tablespace to avoid the crash.

rb://1041 approved by Marko Makela

               FULLTEXT INDEX AND CONCURRENT DML.

Problem Statement:
------------------
1) Create a table with FT index.
2) Enable concurrent inserts.
3) In multiple threads do below operations repeatedly
   a) truncate table
   b) insert into table ....
   c) select ... match .. against .. non-boolean/boolean mode

After some time we could observe two different assert core dumps

Analysis:
--------
1)assert core dump at key_read_cache():
Two select threads operating in-parallel on same key 
root block.
1st select thread block->status is set to BLOCK_ERROR 
because the my_pread() in read_block() is returning '0'. 
Truncate table made the index file size as 1024 and pread 
was asked to get the block of count bytes(1024 bytes) 
from offset of 1024 which it cannot read since its 
"end of file" and retuning '0' setting 
"my_errno= HA_ERR_FILE_TOO_SHORT" and the key_file_length, 
key_root[0] is same i.e. 1024. Since block status has BLOCK_ERROR 
the 1st select thread enter into the free_block() and will 
be under wait on conditional mutex by making status as 
BLOCK_REASSIGNED and goes for wait_on_readers(). Other select 
thread will also work on the same block and sees the status as 
BLOCK_ERROR and enters into free_block(), checks for BLOCK_REASSIGNED 
and asserting the server.

2)assert core dump at key_write_cache():
One select thread and One insert thread.
Select thread gets the unlocks the 'keycache->cache_lock', 
which allows other threads to continue and gets the pread() 
return value as'0'(please see the explanation above) and 
tries to get the lock on 'keycache->cache_lock' and waits 
there for the lock.
Insert thread requests for the block, block will be assigned 
from the hash list and makes the page_status as 
'PAGE_WAIT_TO_BE_READ' and goes for the read_block(), waits 
in the queue since there are some other threads performing 
reads on the same block.
Select thread which was waiting for the 'keycache->cache_lock' 
mutex in the read_block() will continue after getting the my_pread() 
value as '0' and sets the block status as BLOCK_ERROR and goes to 
the free_block() and go to the wait_for_readers().
Now the insert thread will awake and continues. and checks 
block->status as not BLOCK_READ and it asserts.  

Fix:
---
In the full text code, multiple readers of index file is not guarded. 
Hence added below below code in _ft2_search() and walk_and_match().

to lock the key_root I have used below code in _ft2_search()
 if (info->s->concurrent_insert)
    mysql_rwlock_rdlock(&share->key_root_lock[0]);

and to unlock 
 if (info->s->concurrent_insert)
   mysql_rwlock_unlock(&share->key_root_lock[0]);

INNODB_AUTOINC_LOCK_MODE=1 AND USING TRIGGER

When an insert stmt like "insert into t values (1),(2),(3)" is
executed, the autoincrement values assigned to these three rows are
expected to be contiguous.  In the given lock mode
(innodb_autoinc_lock_mode=1), the auto inc lock will be released
before the end of the statement.  So to make the autoincrement
contiguous for a given statement, we need to reserve the auto inc
values at the beginning of the statement.  

rb://1074 approved by Alexander Nozdrin

Improved random number filtering verification on
rpl_filter_tables_not_exist test.

dict_table_replace_index_in_foreign_list(): Replace the dropped index
also in the foreign key constraints of child tables that are
referencing this table.

row_ins_check_foreign_constraint(): If the underlying index is
missing, refuse the operation.

rb:1051 approved by Jimmy Yang

There can be cases when the optimizer calls ha_partition::records_in_range
when there are no matching partitions. So the DBUG_ASSERT of
!tot_used_partitions does assert.

Fixed by returning 0 instead when no matching partitions are found.

This will avoid the crash. records_in_range will then try to find the
biggest used partition, which will not find any partition and
records_in_range will then return 0, meaning non rows can be found.

Patch contributed by Davi Arnaut at twitter.

Rewrite the "parser" in my_strtod_int() to avoid
reading past the end of the input string.

Issue/Cause:
Issue is of memory corruption.During optimization phase, pattern to be matched in where 
clause, is prepared. This is done in Item_func_concat::val_str() function which forms the
resultant string (tmp_value) and return its pointer. In caller, Item_func_like::fix_fields, 
pattern is made to point to this string (tmp_value). In further processing, tmp_value is 
getting modified which causes pattern to have changed/wrong values.

Fix:
Allocate its own memroy location in caller, copy value of resultant string (tmp_value) 
into that and make pattern to point to that. This makes sure no further changes to 
tmp_value will affect pattern.

No commit message

No commit message

The following scenario crashes our mysql server:

1.  set global innodb_file_per_table=1;
2.  create table t1(c1 int) engine=innodb;
3.  alter table t1 discard tablespace;
4.  alter table t1 add unique index(c1);

Step 4 crashes the server.  This patch introduces a check on discarded
tablespace to avoid the crash.

rb://1041 approved by Marko Makela

               FULLTEXT INDEX AND CONCURRENT DML.

Problem Statement:
------------------
1) Create a table with FT index.
2) Enable concurrent inserts.
3) In multiple threads do below operations repeatedly
   a) truncate table
   b) insert into table ....
   c) select ... match .. against .. non-boolean/boolean mode

After some time we could observe two different assert core dumps

Analysis:
--------
1)assert core dump at key_read_cache():
Two select threads operating in-parallel on same key 
root block.
1st select thread block->status is set to BLOCK_ERROR 
because the my_pread() in read_block() is returning '0'. 
Truncate table made the index file size as 1024 and pread 
was asked to get the block of count bytes(1024 bytes) 
from offset of 1024 which it cannot read since its 
"end of file" and retuning '0' setting 
"my_errno= HA_ERR_FILE_TOO_SHORT" and the key_file_length, 
key_root[0] is same i.e. 1024. Since block status has BLOCK_ERROR 
the 1st select thread enter into the free_block() and will 
be under wait on conditional mutex by making status as 
BLOCK_REASSIGNED and goes for wait_on_readers(). Other select 
thread will also work on the same block and sees the status as 
BLOCK_ERROR and enters into free_block(), checks for BLOCK_REASSIGNED 
and asserting the server.

2)assert core dump at key_write_cache():
One select thread and One insert thread.
Select thread gets the unlocks the 'keycache->cache_lock', 
which allows other threads to continue and gets the pread() 
return value as'0'(please see the explanation above) and 
tries to get the lock on 'keycache->cache_lock' and waits 
there for the lock.
Insert thread requests for the block, block will be assigned 
from the hash list and makes the page_status as 
'PAGE_WAIT_TO_BE_READ' and goes for the read_block(), waits 
in the queue since there are some other threads performing 
reads on the same block.
Select thread which was waiting for the 'keycache->cache_lock' 
mutex in the read_block() will continue after getting the my_pread() 
value as '0' and sets the block status as BLOCK_ERROR and goes to 
the free_block() and go to the wait_for_readers().
Now the insert thread will awake and continues. and checks 
block->status as not BLOCK_READ and it asserts.  

Fix:
---
In the full text code, multiple readers of index file is not guarded. 
Hence added below below code in _ft2_search() and walk_and_match().

to lock the key_root I have used below code in _ft2_search()
 if (info->s->concurrent_insert)
    mysql_rwlock_rdlock(&share->key_root_lock[0]);

and to unlock 
 if (info->s->concurrent_insert)
   mysql_rwlock_unlock(&share->key_root_lock[0]);

                     RESULTS ON IN() & NOT IN() COMP #3

This bug causes a wrong result in mysql-trunk when ICP is used
and bad performance in mysql-5.5 and mysql-trunk.

Using the query from bug report to explain what happens and causes
the wrong result from the query when ICP is enabled:

1. The t3 table contains four records. The outer query will read
   these and for each of these it will execute the subquery.

2. Before the first execution of the subquery it will be optimized. In
   this case the important is what happens to the first table t1:
   -make_join_select() will call the range optimizer which decides
    that t1 should be accessed using a range scan on the k1 index
    It creates a QUICK_RANGE_SELECT object for this.
   -As the last part of optimization the ICP code pushes the
    condition down to the storage engine for table t1 on the k1 index.

   This produces the following information in the explain for this table:

     2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t1 range k1 k1 5 NULL 3 Using index condition; Using filesort

   Note the use of filesort.

3. The first execution of the subquery does (among other things) due
   to the need for sorting:
   a. Call create_sort_index() which again will call find_all_keys():
   b. find_all_keys() will read the required keys for all qualifying
      rows from the storage engine. To do this it checks if it has a
      quick-select for the table. It will use the quick-select for
      reading records. In this case it will read four records from the
      storage engine (based on the range criteria). The storage engine
      will evaluate the pushed index condition for each record.
   c. At the end of create_sort_index() there is code that cleans up a
      lot of stuff on the join tab. One of the things that is cleaned
      is the select object. The result of this is that the
      quick-select object created in make_join_select is deleted.

4. The second execution of the subquery does the same as the first but
   the result is different:
   a. Call create_sort_index() which again will call find_all_keys()
      (same as for the first execution)
   b. find_all_keys() will read the keys from the storage engine. To
      do this it checks if it has a quick-select for the table. Now
      there is NO quick-select object(!) (since it was deleted in
      step 3c). So find_all_keys defaults to read the table using a
      table scan instead. So instead of reading the four relevant records
      in the range it reads the entire table (6 records). It then
      evaluates the table's condition (and here it goes wrong). Since
      the entire condition has been pushed down to the storage engine
      using ICP all 6 records qualify. (Note that the storage engine
      will not evaluate the pushed index condition in this case since
      it was pushed for the k1 index and now we do a table scan
      without any index being used).
      The result is that here we return six qualifying key values
      instead of four due to not evaluating the table's condition.
   c. As above.

5. The two last execution of the subquery will also produce wrong results
   for the same reason.

Summary: The problem occurs due to all but the first executions of the
subquery is done as a table scan without evaluating the table's
condition (which is pushed to the storage engine on a different
index). This is caused by the create_sort_index() function deleting
the quick-select object that should have been used for executing the
subquery as a range scan.

Note that this bug in addition to causing wrong results also can
result in bad performance due to executing the subquery using a table
scan instead of a range scan. This is an issue in MySQL 5.5.

The fix for this problem is to avoid that the Quick-select-object that
the optimizer created is deleted when create_sort_index() is doing
clean-up of the join-tab. This will ensure that the quick-select
object and the corresponding pushed index condition will be available
and used by all following executions of the subquery.

No commit message

Automerge from mysql-5.1 into mysql-5.5.

    
Applied the fix that updates yaSSL to 2.2.1 and fixes parsing this 
particular certificate.
Added a test case with the certificate itself.