1. 18 Jan, 2013 3 commits
    • Astha Pareek's avatar
      BUG#11761680 · cdbba604
      Astha Pareek authored
      disabled binlog_spurious_ddl_errors on mysql-5.5
      cdbba604
    • mysql-builder@oracle.com's avatar
      No commit message · a3d71bda
      mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
      No commit message
      a3d71bda
    • Astha Pareek's avatar
      Description · 7752e7d1
      Astha Pareek authored
            The test, binlog.binlog_spurious_ddl_errors was failing on pb2 at the statement
            "UNINSTALL PLUGIN example;" with this warning:
            "Warning	1620	Plugin is busy and will be uninstalled on shutdown "
            
            Fix
            Spurious warnings occur in the test since we do not empty the Query cache,
            used by the example plugin at the time of creating tables using the plugin.
            Hence, the query chache is flushed before uninstalling the plugin.
            Also, as part of running the test across platforms, the plugin installation
            script is changed.
      7752e7d1
  2. 17 Jan, 2013 1 commit
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#16138582 MTR_MEMO_RELEASE AND DYN_ARRAY TOGETHER ARE VERY INEFFICIENT · d82eaad5
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      Get rid of O(n^2) scan in dyn array (mtr->memo) operations, accessing
      the dyn array blocks directly.
      
      dyn_array_get_last_block(), dyn_array_get_next_block(),
      dyn_array_get_prev_block(): Define as a constness-preserving macro.
      
      Add const qualifiers to many dyn_array functions.
      
      mtr_memo_slot_release_func(): Renamed from mtr_memo_slot_release():
      Make mtr_t* a debug-only parameter. Assume that slot->object != NULL.
      
      mtr_memo_pop_all(): Access the dyn_array blocks directly, replacing
      O(n^2) operation with O(n).
      
      mtr_memo_release(): Access the dyn_array blocks directly, replacing
      O(n^2) operation with O(n). This caused the performance problem.
      
      rb#1540 approved by Jimmy Yang
      d82eaad5
  3. 16 Jan, 2013 5 commits
    • Anirudh Mangipudi's avatar
      BUG#14117025: UNABLE TO RESTORE DUMP · b29e22d5
      Anirudh Mangipudi authored
      Null Merge from 5.1 to 5.5
      b29e22d5
    • Anirudh Mangipudi's avatar
      BUG#14117025: UNABLE TO RESTORE DUMP · cd3b2ac9
      Anirudh Mangipudi authored
      Problem: When a view, with a specific character set and collation, 
      is created on another view with a different character set and collation the 
      dump restoration results in an illegal mix of collations error.
      SOLUTION: To avoid this confusion of collations, the create table datatype 
      being used is hardcoded as "tinyint NOT NULL". This will not matter as the table 
      created will be dropped at runtime and specifically tinyint is used to 
      avoid hitting the row size conflicts.
      cd3b2ac9
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#11751794 MYSQL GIVES THE WRONG RESULT WITH SOME SPECIAL USAGE · eb0390a5
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      Consider the following query:
      
      SELECT f_1,..,f_m, AGGREGATE_FN(C)
      FROM t1
      WHERE ...
      GROUP BY ...
      
      Loose index scan ("Using index for group-by") can be used for
      this query if there is an index 'i' covering all fields in the
      select list, and the GROUP BY clause makes up a prefix f1,...,fn
      of 'i'. Furthermore, according to rule NGA2 of
      get_best_group_min_max(), the WHERE clause must contain a
      conjunction of equality predicates for all fields fn+1,...,fm.
      
      The problem in this bug was that a query with WHERE clause that
      broke NGA2(NGA: Non Group Attribuite) was not detected and therefore 
      used loose index scan.
      This lead to wrong result. The query had an index
      covering (c1,c2) and had:
        "WHERE (c1 = 1 AND c2 = 'a') OR (c1 = 2 AND c2 = 'b')
         GROUP BY c1"
      or 
        "WHERE (c1 = 1 ) OR (c1 = 2 AND c2 = 'b')
         GROUP BY c1"
      
      
      This WHERE clause cannot be transformed to a conjunction of
      equality predicates.
      
      The solution is to introduce another rule, NGA3, that complements
      NGA2. NGA3 says that if a gap field (field between those
      listed in GROUP BY and C in the index) has a predicate, then
      there can only be one range in the query. This requirement is
      more strict than it has to be in theory. BUG 15947433 will deal
      with that.
      eb0390a5
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#11751794 MYSQL GIVES THE WRONG RESULT WITH SOME SPECIAL USAGE · 0e787b24
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      Consider the following query:
      
      SELECT f_1,..,f_m, AGGREGATE_FN(C)
      FROM t1
      WHERE ...
      GROUP BY ...
      
      Loose index scan ("Using index for group-by") can be used for
      this query if there is an index 'i' covering all fields in the
      select list, and the GROUP BY clause makes up a prefix f1,...,fn
      of 'i'. Furthermore, according to rule NGA2 of
      get_best_group_min_max(), the WHERE clause must contain a
      conjunction of equality predicates for all fields fn+1,...,fm.
      
      The problem in this bug was that a query with WHERE clause that
      broke NGA2 was not detected and therefore used loose index scan.
      This lead to wrong result. The query had an index
      covering (c1,c2) and had:
        "WHERE (c1 = 1 AND c2 = 'a') OR (c1 = 2 AND c2 = 'b')
         GROUP BY c1"
      or 
        "WHERE (c1 = 1 ) OR (c1 = 2 AND c2 = 'b')
         GROUP BY c1"
      
      
      This WHERE clause cannot be transformed to a conjunction of
      equality predicates.
      
      The solution is to introduce another rule, NGA3, that complements
      NGA2. NGA3 says that if a gap field (field between those
      listed in GROUP BY and C in the index) has a predicate, then
      there can only be one range in the query. This requirement is
      more strict than it has to be in theory. BUG 15947433 will deal
      with that.
      0e787b24
    • mysql-builder@oracle.com's avatar
      No commit message · 346cf755
      mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
      No commit message
      346cf755
  4. 15 Jan, 2013 4 commits
    • Nisha Gopalakrishnan's avatar
      Bug#11757464:SERVER CRASH IN RECURSIVE CALL WHEN OOM · 62e8f256
      Nisha Gopalakrishnan authored
      Analysis:
      ---------
      
      When the server is out of memory, an error is raised
      to indicate the same. Handling the error requires
      more memory to be allocated which fails, hence the
      error handling loops in a recursion and causes the
      server to crash.
      
      Fix:
      ---
      a) Prevents pushing the 'out of memory' error condition
      to the diagnostic area as it requires memory allocation.
      GET DIAGNOSTICS, SHOW WARNINGS and SHOW ERRORS statements
      will not show information about this error. However the
      'out of memory' error is returned to the client.
      b) It sets the ME_FATALERROR flag when 'out of memory' errors
      are reported (for places where the flag is not already set).
      This flag prevents activation of SP error handlers which also
      require memory allocation and therefore are likely to fail.
      62e8f256
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#11758009 - UNION EXECUTION ORDER WRONG ? · a4408441
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      Problem:-
      In case of blob data field, UNION ALL doesn't give correct result.
      
      Analysis:-
      In MyISAM table, when we dont want to check for the distinct for particular 
      key, we set the key_map to zero.
      
      While writing record in MyISAM table, we check the distinct with the help 
      of keys, by checking whether that key is active in key_map and then writing 
      the record.
      
      In case of blob field, we are checking for distinct by unique constraint, 
      where we are not checking whether that unique key is active or not in key_map.
      
      Solution:
      Before checking for distinct, check whether any key is active in key_map.
      a4408441
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#11758009 - UNION EXECUTION ORDER WRONG ? · d8d6f270
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      Problem:-
      In case of blob data field, UNION ALL doesn't give correct result.
      
      Analysis:-
      In MyISAM table, when we dont want to check for the distinct for particular 
      key, we set the key_map to zero.
      
      While writing record in MyISAM table, we check the distinct with the help 
      of keys, by checking whether that key is active in key_map and then writing 
      the record.
      
      In case of blob field, we are checking for distinct by unique constraint, 
      where we are not checking whether that unique key is active or not in key_map.
      
      Solution:-
      Before checking for distinct, check whether any key is active in key_map.
      d8d6f270
    • mysql-builder@oracle.com's avatar
      No commit message · 8552bf4c
      mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
      No commit message
      8552bf4c
  5. 14 Jan, 2013 5 commits
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      · 1a951e71
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      BUG#14303860 - EXECUTING A SELECT QUERY WITH TOO 
      MANY WILDCARDS CAUSES A SEGFAULT
            Back port from 5.6 and trunk
      1a951e71
    • Olav Sandstaa's avatar
      Fix for Bug#14636211 WRONG RESULT (EXTRA ROW) ON A FROM SUBQUERY · e810f7f4
      Olav Sandstaa authored
                           WITH A VARIABLE AND ORDER BY
              Bug#16035412 MYSQL SERVER 5.5.29 WRONG SORTING USING COMPLEX INDEX
            
      This is a fix for a regression introduced by Bug#12667154:
      Bug#12667154 attempted to fix a performance problem with subqueries
      that did filesort. For doing filesort, the optimizer creates a quick
      select object to use when building the sort index. This quick select
      object was deleted after the first call to create_sort_index(). Thus,
      for queries where the subquery was executed multiple times, the quick
      object was only used for the first execution. For all later executions
      of the subquery, filesort used a complete table scan for building the
      sort index. The fix for Bug#12667154 tried to fix this by not deleting
      the quick object after the first execution of create_sort_index() so
      that it would be re-used for building the sort index by the following
      executions of the subquery.
            
      This regression introduced in Bug#12667154 is that due to not deleting
      the quick select object after building the sort index, the quick
      object could in some cases be used also during the second phase of the
      execution of the subquery instead of using the created sort
      index. This caused wrong results to be returned.
            
      The fix for this issue is to delete the reference to the select object
      after it has been used in create_sort_index(). In this way the select 
      and quick objects will not be available when doing the second phase
      of the execution of the select operation. To ensure that the select
      object can be re-used for the following executions of the subquery
      we make a copy of the select pointer. This is used for restoring the
      select object after the select operation is completed.
      e810f7f4
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      BUG#14303860 - EXECUTING A SELECT QUERY WITH TOO · 78664f54
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      MANY WILDCARDS CAUSES A SEGFAULT
      
      Back port from 5.6 and trunk
      78664f54
    • Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com's avatar
    • Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com's avatar
      - BUG#1608883: KILLING A QUERY INSIDE INNODB CAUSES IT TO EVENTUALLY CRASH · e47f3943
        WITH AN ASSERTION
      
        Recently we added check to handle kill query signal for long operating
        queries. 
        While the query interruption is reported it must to ensure cursor is restore
        to proper state for HANDLER interface to work correctly. 
        Normal select query will not face this problem, as on recieving interrupt,
        select query is aborted and new select query result in re-initialization
        (including cursor).
      
        rb://1836. Approved by Marko.
      e47f3943
  6. 12 Jan, 2013 2 commits
    • Nisha Gopalakrishnan's avatar
      BUG#11757250: REPLACE(...) INSIDE A STORED PROCEDURE. · b4b960fc
      Nisha Gopalakrishnan authored
      Merge from 5.1 to 5.5
      b4b960fc
    • Nisha Gopalakrishnan's avatar
      BUG#11757250: REPLACE(...) INSIDE A STORED PROCEDURE. · 3d9d0e77
      Nisha Gopalakrishnan authored
      Analysis:
      --------
      
      REPLACE operation provides incorrect output when
      user variable is supplied as an argument and there
      are multiple rows on which the operation is performed.
      
      Consider the example below:
      
      SET @var='(( 00000000 ++ 00000000 ))';
      SELECT REPLACE(@var, '00000000', table_name) AS a FROM
      INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA='mysql';
      
      Invalid output:
        +---------------------------------------+
        | REPLACE(@var, '00000000', TABLE_NAME) |
        +---------------------------------------+
        | (( columns_priv ++ columns_priv ))    |
        | (( columns_priv ++ columns_priv ))    |
            ......
            ......
        | (( columns_priv ++ columns_priv ))    |
        | (( columns_priv ++ columns_priv ))    |
        | (( columns_priv ++ columns_priv ))    |
        +---------------------------------------+
      
      The user argument supplied as the string to REPLACE
      operation is overwritten after the first iteration
      to '(( columns_priv ++ columns_priv ))'.
      The overwritten string after the first iteration
      is used for the subsequent REPLACE iteration. Since
      the pattern string is not found, it returns invalid
      output as mentioned above.
      
      Fix:
      ---
      If the Alloced_length is zero, realloc() and create a
      copy of the string which is then used for the REPLACE
      operation for every iteration.
      3d9d0e77
  7. 11 Jan, 2013 3 commits
    • Aditya A's avatar
      Bug#15843818 PARTITIONING BY RANGE WITH TO_DAYS ALWAYS · b11fe1b8
      Aditya A authored
                     INCLUDES FIRST PARTITION WHEN PRUNING
      
      [Merge from 5.1 to 5.5]
      b11fe1b8
    • Aditya A's avatar
      Bug#15843818 PARTITIONING BY RANGE WITH TO_DAYS ALWAYS · 01094a4b
      Aditya A authored
                     INCLUDES FIRST PARTITION WHEN PRUNING
      
      
      PROBLEM
      -------
      
      TO_DAYS()/TO_SECONDS() can return NULL for invalid dates which 
      was stored in the first partition ,therefore the first partition 
      was always included for the scan when range was specified.
      
      
      FIX
      ---
      
      The fix is a small optimization which we have included ,which will
      prune the scanning of NULL/first partition if the dates specified 
      in the range are valid and in the same year and month . TO_SECONDS()
      function is not supported in 5.1 so removed it from the fix and test
      scripts for mysql-5.1 version.
      01094a4b
    • Chaithra Gopalareddy's avatar
      Merge from 5.1 to 5.5 · feb36554
      Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
      feb36554
  8. 10 Jan, 2013 6 commits
    • Venkata Sidagam's avatar
      Bug #14553380 MYSQL C API LIBRARY EXITS AT NET_CLEAR AT NET_SERV.CC:223 · a40ea266
      Venkata Sidagam authored
      Problem description: When client loses the connection to the MySQL server or 
      if the server gets shutdown after mysql_stmt_prepare() then the next 
      mysql_stmt_prepare() will return an error(as expected) but consecutive call 
      mysql_stmt_execute(), will crash the client program. 
      The expected behavior would be, it should through an error.
      
      Analysis: The mysql_stmt_prepare() interns calls the function end_server() 
      and net->vio and net->buff are freed and set to NULL. Then the next call 
      mysql_stmt_execute() will interns call net_clear() where we are "net->vio" 
      with out validating it.
      
      Fix: we are validating the net->vio, before calling net_clear().
      a40ea266
    • Chaithra Gopalareddy's avatar
      Bug#11760726: LEFT JOIN OPTIMIZED INTO JOIN LEADS TO · b140c368
      Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
                    INCORRECT RESULTS
      
      This is a backport of fix for Bug#13068506.
      b140c368
    • Praveenkumar Hulakund's avatar
      Merge from 5.1 to 5.5 · d6aed37a
      Praveenkumar Hulakund authored
      d6aed37a
    • Praveenkumar Hulakund's avatar
      Bug#11749556: DEBUG ASSERTION WHEN ACCESSING A VIEW AND · 79438d75
      Praveenkumar Hulakund authored
                    AVAILABLE MEMORY IS TOO LOW 
      
      Analysis:
      ---------
      In function "mysql_make_view", "table->view" is initialized
      after parsing(using File_parser::parse) the view definition.
      If "::parse" function fails then control is moved to label 
      "err:". Here we have assert (table->view == thd->lex). 
      This assert fails if "::parse" function fails, as 
      table->view is not initialized yet.
      
      File_parser::parse fails if data being parsed is incorrect/
      corrupted or when memory allocation fails. In this scenario
      its failing because of failure in memory allocation.
      
      Fix:
      ---------
      In case of failure in function "File_parser::parse", moving
      to label "err:" is incorrect. Modified code to move
      to label "end:".
      79438d75
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      Bug #16004999 ASSERT STATE == TRX_STATE_NOT_STARTED, UNLOCK_ROW() · a69f4a05
      Annamalai Gurusami authored
      Problem:
      
      During the index intersect access method, the SQL layer will access one row,
      that satisfies a set of conditions, using an index i1.  And then it will try to
      access the same row, with other set of conditions using the next index i2.  If
      the fetch from i2 fails (we are talking about an error situation here and not
      simply an unmatched row situation), then it will unlock the row accessed via
      i1.  This will work in all situations except deadlock error.
      
      When a deadlock happens, InnoDB will rollback the transaction.  InnoDB intimates
      the SQL layer about this through the THD::transaction_rollback_request member.
      But this is not currently used by the SQL layer.
      
      Solution:
      
      When an error happens, the SQL layer must check the 
      THD::transaction_rollback_request member, before calling handler::unlock_row().
      We have also added a debug assert in ha_innobase::unlock_row() checking that
      it must be called only when the transaction is in active state.
      
      rb#1773 approved by Marko and Sunny.
      a69f4a05
    • prabakaran thirumalai's avatar
      Bug#16064876 MAIN.KILL FAILS OCCASIONALLY ON SOL10 SPARC64 · b36651dd
      prabakaran thirumalai authored
      Analysis:
      On solaris, killing a connection which waits on debug sync
      (waits on condition variable) is neglected. Subsequent kill
      connection to that thread succeeds. Debug sync code is not
      included in release build hence it is not an customer issue.
      Also verified that except this case, other cases succeed in
      main.kill test script. So moving this test to experimental
      state on solaris platform only in mysql-5.5 branch.
      b36651dd
  9. 09 Jan, 2013 2 commits
  10. 08 Jan, 2013 3 commits
  11. 07 Jan, 2013 4 commits
  12. 04 Jan, 2013 2 commits