1. 16 Aug, 2013 1 commit
  2. 15 Jul, 2013 1 commit
  3. 10 Jul, 2013 1 commit
  4. 09 Jul, 2013 1 commit
  5. 05 Jul, 2013 1 commit
    • Aditya A's avatar
      Bug#17033706 SINCE 5.5.32 & 5.6.12, INNODB CANT START WITH OWN · eee10f38
      Aditya A authored
                   MULTI-FILE TABLESPACE
      
      ANALYSIS
      --------
      
      When a tablespace has multiple data files, InnoDB fails to 
      open the tablespace.  This is because for each ibd file, 
      the first page is checked.But the first page of all ibd file
      need not be the first page of the tablespace.  Only the first
      page of the tablespace contains the tablespace header. When 
      we check the first page of an ibd file that is not the first
      page of the tablespace, then the "tablespace flags" is not
      really available.This was wrongly used to check if a page is
      corrupt or not.
      
      FIX
      ---
      Use the tablespace flags only if the page number is 0 
      in a tablespace.  
      
      [Approved by Inaam rb#2836 ]
      eee10f38
  6. 04 Jul, 2013 1 commit
    • Venkata Sidagam's avatar
      Bug #16567381 DATETIME FIELD COMPARISONS DO NOT WORK PROPERLY · ae59c577
      Venkata Sidagam authored
                      WITH UTF8_UNICODE_CI COLLATION
      Problem Description:
      When comparing datetime values with strings, the utf8_unicode_ci collation 
      prevents correct comparisons. Consider the below set of queries, it is not 
      showing any results on a table which has tuples that satisfies the query. 
      But for collation utf8_general_ci it shows one tuple.
      set names utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci;;
      select * from lang where dt='1979-12-09';
      
      Analysis:
      The comparison function is not chosen in case of collation utf8_unicode_ci.
      In agg_item_set_converter() because the collation state is having 
      "MY_CS_NONASCII" for collation type "utf8_unicode_ci". The conversion 
      of the collation is happening for the date field. And because of that 
      it is unable to pickup proper compare function(i.e CMP_DATE_WITH_STR).
      
      Actually the bug is accidentally introduced by the WL#3759 in 5.5. 
      And in 5.6 it is been fixed by the WL#3664.
      
      Fix:
      I have backported the changes from the file strings/ctype-uca.c which 
      are related to "utf8" introduced by the WL#3664.
      This change helps in choosing the correct comparison function for all 
      the collations of utf8 charset.
      ae59c577
  7. 01 Jul, 2013 3 commits
  8. 28 Jun, 2013 2 commits
  9. 27 Jun, 2013 2 commits
  10. 26 Jun, 2013 3 commits
  11. 25 Jun, 2013 1 commit
  12. 24 Jun, 2013 3 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      No commit message · 87015f4c
      unknown authored
      No commit message
      87015f4c
    • Sujatha Sivakumar's avatar
      Bug#16753869:INCORRECT TRUNCATION OF LONG SET EXPRESSION IN · ce29ca8b
      Sujatha Sivakumar authored
      LOAD DATA CAN CAUSE SQL INJECTION
      
      Problem:
      =======
      A long SET expression in LOAD DATA is incorrectly truncated
      when written to the binary log.
      
      Analysis:
      ========
      LOAD DATA statements are reconstructed once again before
      they are written to the binary log. When SET clauses are
      specified as part of LOAD DATA statement, these SET clause
      user command strings need to be stored as it is inorder to
      reconstruct the original user command.  At present these
      strings are stored as part of SET clause item tree's
      top most Item node's name itself which is incorrect. As an
      Item::name can be of MAX_ALIAS_NAME (256) size. Hence the
      name will get truncated to "255".
      
      Because of this the rewritten LOAD DATA statement will be
      terminated incorrectly.  When this statment is read back by
      the mysqlbinlog tool it reads a starting single quote and
      continuos to read till it finds an ending quote. Hence any
      statement written post ending quote will be considered as
      a new statement.
      
      Fix:
      ===
      As name field has length restriction the string value
      should not be stored in Item::name.  A new String list is
      maintained to store the SET expression values and this list
      is read during reconstrution.
      
      sql/sql_lex.cc:
        Clear the load data set string list during each query 
        execution.
      sql/sql_lex.h:
        Added a new String list to store the load data operation's
        SET clause user command strings.
      sql/sql_load.cc:
        Read the SET clause user command strings from load data
        set string list.
      sql/sql_yacc.yy:
        Store the SET caluse user command string as part of load
        data set string list.
      ce29ca8b
    • unknown's avatar
      No commit message · 99c7d1f1
      unknown authored
      No commit message
      99c7d1f1
  13. 21 Jun, 2013 1 commit
    • Tor Didriksen's avatar
      Bug#16945503 ADDRESSSANITIZER BUG IN SYS_VARS · 98ed58ca
      Tor Didriksen authored
      Sys_var_keycache inherits from some variant of Sys_var_integer
      
      Instances of Sys_var_keycache are initialized using the KEYCACHE_VAR macro,
      which takes an offset within st_key_cache.
      However, the Sys_var_integer CTOR treats the offset as if it was within
      global_system_variables (hidden within some layers of macros and fuction
      pointers)
      
      The result is that we write arbitrary data to arbitrary locations in memory.
      This all happens during static initialization of global objects,
      i.e. before we have even entered the main() function.
      
      
      Bug#12325449 TYPO IN CMAKE/DTRACE.CMAKE
      Fix typo in dtrace.cmake
      98ed58ca
  14. 19 Jun, 2013 2 commits
  15. 18 Jun, 2013 4 commits
  16. 17 Jun, 2013 1 commit
  17. 14 Jun, 2013 7 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#16914007-INNODB: CHECK TABLE SHOULD MARK AN INDEX AS CORRUPTED · e0c68b15
      unknown authored
      IF IT HAS A WRONG COUNT
      
      If CHECK TABLE finds that a secondary index contains the wrong
      number of entries, it used to report an error but not mark the
      index as corrupt. The error means that the index should be rebuilt,
      which can be done with ALTER TABLE DROP INDEX and ALTER TABLE ADD
      INDEX.  But just in case the DBA does not pay any attention to the
      output of CHECK TABLE, the secondary index should be marked as
      corrupted so that it is not used again.
      
      Approved by Inaam in RB:2607
      e0c68b15
    • Tor Didriksen's avatar
      Bug#14834378 ADDRESSSANITIZER BUG IN FILENAME_TO_TABLENAME · 45f739bd
      Tor Didriksen authored
      Backport to 5.5
      
      
      sql/sql_table.cc:
        gcc asan crashes in filename_to_tablename() on this: memcmp("-@", "#sql", 4)
        during loading of the innobase plugin
      45f739bd
    • unknown's avatar
      No commit message · 28c67699
      unknown authored
      No commit message
      28c67699
    • Tor Didriksen's avatar
      Bug#16729109: FIX COMPILATION WARNINGS WITH GCC 4.8 · c94ccb23
      Tor Didriksen authored
      Backport to 5.5
      (external Bug#69407 Build warnings with mysql)
      
      
      support-files/build-tags:
        Run etags on sql_yacc.yy, ignore other .yy files
      unittest/mysys/explain_filename-t.cc:
        NO_PLAN seems to fail on some platforms, use the actual number instead.
      c94ccb23
    • unknown's avatar
      No commit message · d0e58676
      unknown authored
      No commit message
      d0e58676
    • Aditya A's avatar
      Bug#13548704 ALGORITHM USED FOR DROPPING PARTITIONED TABLE CAN LEAD · 291e0296
      Aditya A authored
                   TO INCONSISTENCY 
      [Merge from 5.1]
      
      291e0296
    • Aditya A's avatar
      Bug#13548704 ALGORITHM USED FOR DROPPING PARTITIONED TABLE CAN LEAD · dfb6f63b
      Aditya A authored
                   TO INCONSISTENCY 
      
      PROBLEM
      --------
      When we drop a partitoned table , we first gather the
      information about partitions in the table from the 
      table_name.par file and store it in an internal data 
      structure.Then we delete this file and the data in 
      the table. If the server crashes  after deleting the
      file,then after recovering we cannot access the table
      .Even we cannot drop the table ,because drop algorithm
      requires par file to read the partition information.
      
      
      FIX
      ---
      1. We move the part of deleting par file after deleting 
         all the table data from the storage egine.
      2. During drop operation if we detect that the par 
         file is missing then we delete the .frm file,since 
         there is no way of recovering without par file.
        
      [Approved by Mattias rb#2576 ]   
      dfb6f63b
  18. 13 Jun, 2013 1 commit
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      Bug #16417635 INNODB FAILS TO MERGE UNDER-FILLED PAGES DEPENDING · d9a71d5c
      Annamalai Gurusami authored
      ON DELETION ORDER
      
      Problem:
      
      When a InnoDB index page is under-filled, we will merge it with either
      the left sibling node or the right sibling node.  But this checking is
      incorrect.  When the left sibling node is available, even if merging
      is not possible with left sibling node, we do not check for the 
      possibility of merging with the right sibling node.  
      
      Solution:
      
      If left sibling node is available, and merging with left sibling node
      is not possible, then check if merge with right sibling node is
      possible.
      
      rb#2506 approved by jimmy & ima.
      
      d9a71d5c
  19. 12 Jun, 2013 2 commits
    • Sivert Sorumgard's avatar
      Bug #14227431: CHARACTER SET MISMATCH WHEN ALTERING FOREIGN KEYS · c8fc3db1
      Sivert Sorumgard authored
      CAN LEAD TO MISSING TABLES
      
      Overview
      --------
      If the FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS system variable is set to 0, it is
      possible to break a foreign key constraint by changing the type
      or character set of the foreign key column, or by dropping the
      foreign key index (without carrying out corresponding changes on
      another table in the relationship).
      
      If we subsequently set FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS to 1 and execute ALTER
      TABLE involving the COPY algorithm on such a table, the following
      happens:
      
      1) If ALTER TABLE does not contain a RENAME clause, the attempt 
         to install the new version of the table instead of the old one
         will fail due to the fact that the inconsistency will be 
         detected. An attempt to revert the partially executed alter 
         table operation by restoring the old table definition will 
         fail as well due to FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS == 1. As a result, the 
         table being altered will be lost.
      2) If ALTER TABLE contains the RENAME clause, the inconsistency 
         will not be detected (most probably due to other bugs). But if
         an attempt to install the new version of the table fails (for 
         example, due to a failure when updating triggers associated 
         with the table), reverting the partially executed alter table 
         by restoring the old table definition will fail too. So the 
         table being altered might be lost as well.
      
      
      Suggested fix
      -------------
      The suggested fix is to temporarily unset the option bit
      representing FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS when the old table definition is
      restored while reverting the partially executed operation.
      c8fc3db1
    • unknown's avatar
      No commit message · b75b3229
      unknown authored
      No commit message
      b75b3229
  20. 10 Jun, 2013 2 commits