- 13 Aug, 2015 3 commits
-
-
MinchinWeb authored
-
MinchinWeb authored
See #32
-
MinchinWeb authored
-
- 01 Aug, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
- 31 Jul, 2015 4 commits
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
Fixes #20.
- 14 Jul, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
Tags with a value of length 1 were not highlighted with the metadata color. Compare: http://pythex.org/?regex=\b\S%2B%3A[^%2F\s]\S%2B\b&test_string=star%3A1%0Astar%3A12&ignorecase=0&multiline=0&dotall=0&verbose=0 http://pythex.org/?regex=\b\S%2B%3A[^%2F\s]\S*\b&test_string=star%3A1%0Astar%3A12&ignorecase=0&multiline=0&dotall=0&verbose=0
-
- 10 Jul, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
Tags with a value of length 1 were not highlighted with the metadata color. Compare: http://pythex.org/?regex=\b\S%2B%3A[^%2F\s]\S%2B\b&test_string=star%3A1%0Astar%3A12&ignorecase=0&multiline=0&dotall=0&verbose=0 http://pythex.org/?regex=\b\S%2B%3A[^%2F\s]\S*\b&test_string=star%3A1%0Astar%3A12&ignorecase=0&multiline=0&dotall=0&verbose=0
-
- 22 Jun, 2015 1 commit
-
-
root authored
-
- 20 Jun, 2015 6 commits
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
If there was a todo with 'foo:somestring', it wouldn't be returned with the command above, because somestring couldn't be converted to a date or an integer, and therefore the OrdinalTagFilter just returns False. As a final fallback, use a GrepFilter match to do the string comparison such that the todo item(s) with this key:value combination will be returned.
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
If there was a todo with 'foo:somestring', it wouldn't be returned with the command above, because somestring couldn't be converted to a date or an integer, and therefore the OrdinalTagFilter just returns False. As a final fallback, use a GrepFilter match to do the string comparison such that the todo item(s) with this key:value combination will be returned.
-
- 18 Jun, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
Priority Aa or AB is (still) not allowed.
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
Conflicts: README.md
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
- 13 Jun, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
- 12 Jun, 2015 5 commits
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
The previous commit had the archive condition on the wrong place, resulting that todo.txt files were not written out at all if archiving was disabled. Also introduce the (overall) -a flag to disable auto archiving. -a comes from the original todo.txt CLI. It would have been nicer to have DoCommand support the -a flag, however, DoCommand doesn't know anything about archiving and I would like to keep it that way. Addresses issue #42.
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
(Note that commenting/omitting archive_filename will still by default write the archived entries to done.txt). This addresses issue #42.
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
- 11 Jun, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
Conflicts: topydo/lib/DCommand.py
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
Expression-mode for del, depri, do, pri, postpone.
-
- 10 Jun, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
Fell into the trap of calling a function as a default parameter. Because of this, relative dates used with the 'add' or 'do' command (recurrence) were based on an offset when topydo was started, not when the subcommand was executed. Usually these two events occur in the same second and this bug was unnoticed for a long time. But now with prompt mode, this bug may surface if you leave running topydo for longer than a day.
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
Fell into the trap of calling a function as a default parameter. Because of this, relative dates used with the 'add' or 'do' command (recurrence) were based on an offset when topydo was started, not when the subcommand was executed. Usually these two events occur in the same second and this bug was unnoticed for a long time. But now with prompt mode, this bug may surface if you leave running topydo for longer than a day.
-
Jacek Sowiński authored
- add test for direct todo.txt editing - remove unneceseary `u()`
-
- 09 Jun, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Jacek Sowiński authored
- execute_multi_specific() -> _execute_multi_specific() - execute_not_multi() -> _execute_not_multi()
-
Jacek Sowiński authored
MultiCommand._catch_todo_errors() prevents occuring of those.
-
Jacek Sowiński authored
-
- 08 Jun, 2015 4 commits
-
-
Bram Schoenmakers authored
-
Jacek Sowiński authored
This required some refactoring in MultiCommand and ExpressionCommand. Whole part about processing flags was refactored. Code related to flags from DCommand was moved into MultiCommand and reused from there in all "multi" commands. New attribute: ExpressionCommand.last_argument. Should be set to True if command is using the last argument as something other than todo ID or part of an expression (as in case of postpone or pri). By default set to False. New method: MultiCommand.execute_not_multi(): wrapper for functionality not connected with todo IDs (like `topydo edit` or `topydo edit -d`). New attribute: MultiCommand.multi_mode: Should be set to True if user wants to operate on multiple todo items. True by default. New method: MultiCommand.get_todos_from_expr(): gets todo IDs based on expression and puts it in MultiCommand.todos. EditCommand._open_in_editor() now accepts only one argument - file to editing. It handles now also OSError exceptions. It is used also to opening todo.txt and done.txt. MultiCommand.get_todos() doesn't accept anymore todo IDs as an argument. Instead it's using inherited Expression.last_argument` to decide upon where to find todo IDs.
-
Jacek Sowiński authored
Now desired result of DCommand.get_flags() should be more apparent.
-
Jacek Sowiński authored
-