Commit 0449add7 authored by Mitchell Hashimoto's avatar Mitchell Hashimoto

website: template provisioner docs

parent 1676befc
---
layout: "docs"
---
# Templates: Provisioners
Within the template, the provisioners section contains an array of all the
provisioners that Packer should use to install and configure software within
running machines prior to turning them into machine images.
Provisioners are _optional_. If no provisioners are defined within a template,
then no software other than the defaults will be installed within the
resulting machine images. This is not typical, however, since much of the
value of Packer is to produce multiple identical images
of pre-configured software.
This documentation page will cover how to configure a provisioner in a template.
The specific configuration options available for each provisioner, however,
must be referenced from the documentation for that specific provisioner.
Within a template, a section of provisioner definitions looks like this:
<pre class="prettyprint">
{
"provisioners": [
... one or more provisioner definitions here ...
]
}
</pre>
## Provisioner Definition
A provisioner definition is a JSON object that must contain at least
the `type` key. This key specifies the name of the provisioner to use.
Additional keys within the object are used to configure the provisioner,
with the exception of a handful of special keys, covered later.
As an example, the "shell" provisioner requires at least the `path` key,
which specifies a path to a shell script to execute within the machines
being created.
An example provisioner definition is shown below, configuring the shell
provisioner to run a local script within the machines:
<pre class="prettyprint">
{
"type": "shell",
"path": "script.sh"
}
</pre>
## Build-Specific Overrides
While the goal of Packer is to produce identical machine images, it
sometimes requires periods of time where the machines are different before
they eventually converge to be identical. In these cases, different configurations
for provisioners may be necessary depending on the build. This can be done
using build-specific overrides.
An example of where this might be necessary is when building both an EC2 AMI
and a VMware machine. The source EC2 AMI may setup a user with administrative
privileges by default, whereas the VMware machine doesn't have these privileges.
In this case, the shell script may need to be executed differently. Of course,
the goal is that hopefully the shell script converges these two images to be
identical. However, they may initially need to be run differently.
This example is shown below:
<pre class="prettyprint">
{
"type": "shell",
"path": "script.sh",
"override": {
"vmware": {
"execute_command": "echo 'password' | sudo -S bash {{.Path}}"
}
}
}
</pre>
As you can see, the `override` key is used. The value of this key is another
JSON object where the key is the name of a [builder definition](/docs/templates/builders.html).
The value of this is in turn another JSON object. This JSON object simply
contains the provisioner configuration as normal. This configuration is merged
into the default provisioner configuration.
......@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
<li class="nav-header">Templates</li>
<li><a href="/docs/templates/introduction.html">Introduction</a></li>
<li><a href="/docs/templates/builders.html">Builders</a></li>
<li><a href="#">Provisioners</a></li>
<li><a href="/docs/templates/provisioners.html">Provisioners</a></li>
<li class="nav-header">Builders</li>
<li><a href="#">EC2 (AMI)</a></li>
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment