- 08 Jun, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Tommy Lindgren authored
If writing the INTERRUPT response returns ENOENT it means that the referred request is no longer known by the kernel. This is a normal if the referred request already has completed. We thus suppress the scary warning unless debugging is enabled. Fixes #375. Change-Id: I3266dbd8ad53a42db9e0e746e4734f284746b76c
-
- 03 Jun, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
Enabling the logger shows this helpful warning warning: Inode.Path: n3 is orphaned, replacing segment with ".go-fuse.5577006791947779410/deleted" for the problem reported at https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/398 , and it generally makes sense to have complete logs for tests. Enable the logger. Change-Id: I4602f100a31c6e50bc48251a877b97ce3013ff24
-
- 08 May, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
Enables kernel ACL enforcement. Change-Id: I7fb5f6f8b350ad430da18e0173df942b98da7c02
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
With CAP_POSIX_ACL = (1 << 20) the ACLs actually work. Change-Id: Ic91e9f8d4196c811d4c566455b0e8c4a7871b105
-
- 23 Apr, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
Introduce the new struct inodeParents that wraps a map and one special slot for the most recent parent. Unit tests included. Because the map is lazily initialized, we should save some memory on the common single-parent case (= file with no hard links) compared to before. Benchmarking with gocryptfs shows no discernible change in performance. fsstress testing with gocryptfs shows no issues. TestStaleHardlinks the previous commit passes now. Change-Id: I8d69093abc906addde751a9e70dbd78a3a61371a
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
This test shows a problem in selecting a random path for a node when there is more than one. The failure looks like this: 18:41:50.796468 rx 136: LOOKUP n1 ["link0"] 6b 18:41:50.796489 tx 136: OK, {n2 g1 tE=0s tA=0s {M0100600 SZ=0 L=1 1026:1026 B0*4096 i0:269663 A 1616348510.793212 M 1616348510.793212 C 1616348510.795212}} 18:41:50.796535 rx 138: OPEN n2 {O_RDONLY,0x8000} 18:41:50.796557 tx 138: 2=no such file or directory, {Fh 0 } The LOOKUP succeeds (because the file "link0" is there). But the OPEN fails because go-fuse chooses another (stale) path. I will try to make the behavoir more robust against changes behind our back, but this patch only adds a test to show the problem. Change-Id: I39b31ba717ddaaad7dda6ecd86707c75cd25102e
-
- 12 Apr, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
Change-Id: Ide563371
-
- 10 Apr, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
Release isn't synchronized, so a quick [close,unlink] sequence may still fail without this delay. Change-Id: I64170fca
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
This is a more complete emulation of Windows FS semantics. Change-Id: If9dec3ebeac808e1cc4f6d234290867c50e87a30
-
- 22 Mar, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Tommy Lindgren authored
This avoids a panic. Change-Id: I5c4cc0d875ecdbc3b07c2322b5a5a5e6fa493709
-
- 01 Feb, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Tommy Lindgren authored
Previously maximum number of requests readers was hard-coded to 2. Setting it to max(2, min(16, GOMAXPROCS)) improves the throughput on systems with more cores available. Going beyond 16 readers seems to hurt performance even if there are more cores available. Benchmark GoFuseRead can be used for demonstrating the effects of this variable. The benchmark reads 32 streams in parallel from a dummy filesystem (read operations immediately return zeros). Example results from an i7-8550U (8 cores): | Max readers | Total throughput | | ----------: | ---------------: | | 2 | 13217 MB/s | | 4 | 19202 MB/s | | 8 | 19973 MB/s | | 16 | 18994 MB/s | On a 96 core system: | Max readers | Total throughput | | ----------: | ---------------: | | 2 | 11490 MB/s | | 4 | 16129 MB/s | | 8 | 24263 MB/s | | 16 | 29568 MB/s | | 32 | 28262 MB/s | Note that improvements won't be as dramatic for real filesytem implementations. In benchmarks for a filesystem doing real work I see a 30-40% improvement (8.3 -> 11.4 GB/s) on the 96 core system. Also tweaked some of the other benchmarks so they don't leave behind mountpoints. Fixes #388. Change-Id: Ibff17d7fc92195f078a9ccff818a31f3a58873f2
-
- 25 Jan, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
This test mmap()s a file, which means reading the memory can block, triggering file I/O and FUSE requests. With GOMAXPROCS=1, we don't have a free thread to handle those requests, deadlocking the test: GOMAXPROCS=1 go test -v -count=1 -run TestCacheControl ./fuse/test Use mlock() to fix that, also add a warning to the "fuse" package docs. Fixes https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/261 Change-Id: Ia32fb1826c2be602cf4f0f6cf73956af797c940c
-
- 21 Jan, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
Make LoopbackNode and LoopbackRoot public, and add an example of how to extend them. Fixes #364. Change-Id: Idcce1bf3765e93ece3bcf9d14de8a957b8c6b63a
-
- 04 Jan, 2021 1 commit
-
-
midchildan authored
Closes #379. Change-Id: Ieb821fe7e68a3b7822306ad620dcdf834b5dfc12
-
- 31 Dec, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
Document LoopbackNode, LoopbackRoot. Use loopbackRoot.newNode() for creating new nodes Change-Id: I625c7706
-
- 27 Dec, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
Change-Id: I19d52f14f63f1481b2b1aa9dcd46c91fe4e1ad99
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
This leaves only one type to implement for the loopback file system, which will simplify extending the loopback functionality. Change-Id: I8906755f3bdf2ea63557d5bb25f50651521364c7
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
This provides a test for GitHub PR #378, ie. the previous commit Change-Id: I9473722e
-
abitduck authored
Change-Id: I8845cac5c18d2640b46971564f94f7ff1741a0ee
-
- 09 Dec, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
On OSX, syscall.O_TRUNC on the Create call apparently triggers a SETATTR call with size 0, which must be responded to correctly. Change-Id: Icb99891eae99ced6ffbd5fb1dadf42ffad687534
-
- 08 Dec, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
Some of the error codes due to the poll hack get returned back to the OSX mount process, which leads to failing mounts. Change-Id: I5b10509c3b8173343caf3f67c0e12a25ddfae32b
-
- 01 Dec, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
syscall.Dirent declares a 256-byte "name" field. In reality, this field is only as long as necessary to transmit the name, so more entries can be packed in a page. When casting the result to syscall.Dirent, the result might run over the end of the byte buffer, which the race detector doesn't like. Address this by using our own flavor of syscall.Dirent. All linux flavors use the same structure layout, except for the amount of padding at the end. Change-Id: I618f7ef9e167894e1ab25b2113dcd20d7b76ceb4
-
- 04 Nov, 2020 5 commits
-
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
nodeid and inode number used to be identical, which is why both could be marked as "iXXX". This is no longer the case, so make nodeids distinguishable. Example: 23:47:17.637736 rx 9156: MKDIR n28 {0777 (00)} ["d90X"] 5b 23:47:17.637801 tx 9156: OK, {n112 g1 tE=1s tA=1s {M040755 SZ=4096 L=2 1026:1026 B8*4096 i0:2769795 A 1601761637.637385 M 1601761637.637385 C 1601761637.637385}} v4: also update orphaned inode warning Change-Id: Ib29dabfd4cf6692cf4118191f8dc73529562426f
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
Using the inode numbers as the nodeid causes problems when the fs reuses inode numbers. This is the case with any overlay filesystem that is backed by ext4 like the loopback example or gocryptfs. We already had the expSleep() and re-add hack, 7090b027 fs: wait out apparent inode type change 68f70527 fs: addNewChild(): handle concurrent FORGETs to mitigate some of the problems (at the risk of deadlocking forever), but I could not find a way to work around the following case uncovered by fsstress: The kernel expects a fresh nodeid from MKDIR (see #372 for a debug log). This is now guaranteed by passing the O_EXCL to addNewChild(). However, this also means that the hard link detection must happen in addNewChild() as opposed to newInodeUnlocked() before. The expSleep and re-add hacks are no longer needed and have been dropped. This survived 24 hours (42587 iterations) of fsstress testing. Tested was the loopback example running on top of ext4 on Linux 5.8.10. Fixes https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/372 . v2: Rename inoMap -> stableAttrs, nodeidMap -> kernelNodeIds acc. to feedback from Han-Wen. v3: initialize Inode.nodeId early v4: drop leftover file stash.txt Change-Id: Ibb36a886f15d48727daa10b9717ea88e45a6b8af
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
With rename and link, it hangs within 20ms, so we can reduce the runtime. Also add deadlock detection & statistics printout. A good run looks like this: $ TMPDIR=/var/tmp go test -run TestFsstress -v === RUN TestFsstress simple_test.go:601: Operation statistics: simple_test.go:604: creat: 33 ok, 132978 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: link: 85 ok, 37196 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: mkdir: 60 ok, 155273 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: mkfifo: 45 ok, 161937 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: mknod_fifo: 55 ok, 154459 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: mknod_reg: 77 ok, 180614 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: mknod_sock: 83 ok, 139479 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: readdir: 13 ok, 0 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: remove: 180 ok, 40 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: rename: 646 ok, 137 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: rmdir: 48 ok, 48342 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: symlink: 30 ok, 119954 fail, 0 hung simple_test.go:604: unlink: 150 ok, 6121 fail, 0 hung --- PASS: TestFsstress (1.02s) PASS ok github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/v2/fs 1.022s A bad run like this: go-fuse/fs$ TMPDIR=/var/tmp go test -run TestFsstress -v === RUN TestFsstress simple_test.go:592: timeout waiting for goroutines to exit (deadlocked?) simple_test.go:601: Operation statistics: simple_test.go:604: creat: 0 ok, 44 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: link: 0 ok, 6 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: mkdir: 1 ok, 283 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: mkfifo: 1 ok, 140 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: mknod_fifo: 1 ok, 1246 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: mknod_reg: 0 ok, 19 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: mknod_sock: 0 ok, 110 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: readdir: 1 ok, 0 fail, 1 hung simple_test.go:604: remove: 1 ok, 0 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: rename: 0 ok, 12 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: rmdir: 1 ok, 346 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: symlink: 1 ok, 1456 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:604: unlink: 2 ok, 15 fail, 10 hung simple_test.go:51: /usr/bin/fusermount: failed to unmount /var/tmp/TestFsstress302646914/mnt: Device or resource busy (code exit status 1) --- FAIL: TestFsstress (2.30s) FAIL [hangs] Change-Id: I9eb0ce02eb1df766be257d6a87de53c6ffa6d21e
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
TestFsstress is loosely modeled after xfstest's fsstress. It performs rapid parallel removes / creates / readdirs. Coupled with inode reuse, this test used to deadlock go-fuse quite quickly. Change-Id: Ia3af099e08c74d3c160062c1ed414430b6c1e7c9
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
If this happens, it means our node accounting is messed up. Abort the process by panicing instead of wrapping around to UINT_MAX. Change-Id: Id662ab03877d44a16785bfd164a96173a3b7519f
-
- 07 Oct, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
If kernel internally serializes lookup requests for a directory, the test will deadlock, becaue it tries to issue two such request and pause lookup handlers, untill both requests come in. For example here is how this test hangs on Ubuntu Xenial 16.04: kirr@kubu:~/t/go-fuse$ go test -count=1 -v -run TestNodeParallelLookup ./fuse/test/ === RUN TestNodeParallelLookup 18:24:38.494651 rx 1: INIT i0 {7.23 Ra 0x20000 POSIX_LOCKS,ATOMIC_O_TRUNC,EXPORT_SUPPORT,DONT_MASK,FLOCK_LOCKS,READDIRPLUS_AUTO,ASYNC_DIO,WRITEBACK_CACHE,SPLICE_WRITE,SPLICE_READ,IOCTL_DIR,AUTO_INVAL_DATA,READDIRPLUS,NO_OPEN_SUPPORT,ASYNC_READ,BIG_WRITES,SPLICE_MOVE} 18:24:38.494713 tx 1: OK, {7.23 Ra 0x20000 ASYNC_READ,BIG_WRITES,AUTO_INVAL_DATA,READDIRPLUS,NO_OPEN_SUPPORT 0/0 Wr 0x10000 Tg 0x0} 18:24:38.495351 rx 2: LOOKUP i1 [".go-fuse-epoll-hack"] 20b 18:24:38.495467 tx 2: OK, {i18446744073709551615 g0 tE=0s tA=0s {M0100644 SZ=0 L=1 0:0 B0*0 i0:18446744073709551615 A 0.000000 M 0.000000 C 0.000000}} 18:24:38.495530 rx 3: OPEN i18446744073709551615 {O_RDONLY,0x8000} 18:24:38.495575 tx 3: OK, {Fh 18446744073709551615 } 18:24:38.495624 rx 4: POLL i18446744073709551615 18:24:38.495659 tx 4: 38=function not implemented 18:24:38.495706 rx 5: FLUSH i18446744073709551615 {Fh 18446744073709551615} 18:24:38.495741 tx 5: 34=numerical result out of range 18:24:38.495812 rx 6: RELEASE i18446744073709551615 {Fh 18446744073709551615 0x8000 L0} 18:24:38.495849 tx 6: 34=numerical result out of range 18:24:38.495904 rx 7: LOOKUP i1 ["world"] 6b 18:24:38.495957 I: <- lookup "world" < hang > Amends: 17c0c400 (nodefs: Allow for several Lookup requests to be served simultaneously) Updates: https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/261 Change-Id: I5d0a76d1190af805351326c378f69cf8ff781a37
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
GOMAXPROCS=1 currently triggers tests hang: https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/261 Change-Id: I3dc98c8bbdaac7a4ce86639e405ba1a1cef4c295
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Change-Id: I8291dceac66bd02bc8fbb845d1f125c4cf22f48e
-
- 08 Sep, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
When a filesystem is mounted with the default_permissions mount option (which you want to do when other users can access the mount), the kernel issues extra GETATTR calls to determine access rights. The GETATTR was not handled and pollHack failed with "numerical result out of range", preventing the mount from succeeding. Handle GETATTR so mounting with default_permissions works again. Before: $ gocryptfs -fusedebug -extpass "echo test" -ko default_permissions a b Reading password from extpass program "echo", arguments: ["test"] Decrypting master key 2020/09/08 19:09:21 rx 2: INIT i0 {7.31 Ra 0x20000 ABORT_ERROR,MAX_PAGES,ATOMIC_O_TRUNC,EXPORT_SUPPORT,READDIRPLUS_AUTO,ASYNC_DIO,NO_OPEN_SUPPORT,PARALLEL_DIROPS,ASYNC_READ,BIG_WRITES,SPLICE_MOVE,WRITEBACK_CACHE,HANDLE_KILLPRIV,NO_OPENDIR_SUPPORT,CACHE_SYMLINKS,EXPLICIT_INVAL_DATA,POSIX_LOCKS,SPLICE_WRITE,SPLICE_READ,IOCTL_DIR,AUTO_INVAL_DATA,READDIRPLUS,DONT_MASK,FLOCK_LOCKS,POSIX_ACL} 2020/09/08 19:09:21 tx 2: OK, {7.28 Ra 0x20000 AUTO_INVAL_DATA,READDIRPLUS,NO_OPEN_SUPPORT,PARALLEL_DIROPS,ASYNC_READ,BIG_WRITES 0/0 Wr 0x20000 Tg 0x0} 2020/09/08 19:09:21 rx 4: GETATTR i1 {Fh 0} 2020/09/08 19:09:21 tx 4: OK, {tA=1s {M040755 SZ=80 L=2 1026:1026 B0*4096 i0:1 A 1599584934.254242 M 1599584467.201817 C 1599584467.201817}} 2020/09/08 19:09:21 rx 6: GETATTR i1 {Fh 0} 2020/09/08 19:09:21 tx 6: OK, {tA=1s {M040755 SZ=80 L=2 1026:1026 B0*4096 i0:1 A 1599584934.254242 M 1599584467.201817 C 1599584467.201817}} 2020/09/08 19:09:21 rx 8: LOOKUP i1 [".go-fuse-epoll-hack"] 20b 2020/09/08 19:09:21 tx 8: OK, {i18446744073709551615 g0 tE=0s tA=0s {M0100644 SZ=0 L=1 0:0 B0*0 i0:18446744073709551615 A 0.000000 M 0.000000 C 0.000000}} 2020/09/08 19:09:21 rx 10: LOOKUP i1 [".Trash"] 7b 2020/09/08 19:09:21 tx 10: 2=no such file or directory, {i0 g0 tE=1s tA=0s {M00 SZ=0 L=0 0:0 B0*0 i0:0 A 0.000000 M 0.000000 C 0.000000}} 2020/09/08 19:09:21 rx 12: GETATTR i18446744073709551615 {Fh 0} 2020/09/08 19:09:21 tx 12: 34=numerical result out of range, {tA=0s {M00 SZ=0 L=0 0:0 B0*0 i0:0 A 0.000000 M 0.000000 C 0.000000}} fs.Mount failed: numerical result out of range After: $ gocryptfs -fusedebug -extpass "echo test" -ko default_permissions a b Reading password from extpass program "echo", arguments: ["test"] Decrypting master key 2020/09/08 19:21:33 rx 2: INIT i0 {7.31 Ra 0x20000 READDIRPLUS,POSIX_ACL,CACHE_SYMLINKS,SPLICE_WRITE,IOCTL_DIR,AUTO_INVAL_DATA,FLOCK_LOCKS,ASYNC_DIO,HANDLE_KILLPRIV,ABORT_ERROR,ATOMIC_O_TRUNC,BIG_WRITES,DONT_MASK,SPLICE_MOVE,PARALLEL_DIROPS,EXPORT_SUPPORT,SPLICE_READ,READDIRPLUS_AUTO,WRITEBACK_CACHE,NO_OPEN_SUPPORT,ASYNC_READ,POSIX_LOCKS,MAX_PAGES,NO_OPENDIR_SUPPORT,EXPLICIT_INVAL_DATA} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 tx 2: OK, {7.28 Ra 0x20000 NO_OPEN_SUPPORT,ASYNC_READ,AUTO_INVAL_DATA,READDIRPLUS,BIG_WRITES,PARALLEL_DIROPS 0/0 Wr 0x20000 Tg 0x0} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 rx 4: GETATTR i1 {Fh 0} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 tx 4: OK, {tA=1s {M040755 SZ=80 L=2 1026:1026 B0*4096 i0:1 A 1599585687.491337 M 1599585688.791343 C 1599585688.791343}} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 rx 6: GETATTR i1 {Fh 0} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 tx 6: OK, {tA=1s {M040755 SZ=80 L=2 1026:1026 B0*4096 i0:1 A 1599585687.491337 M 1599585688.791343 C 1599585688.791343}} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 rx 8: LOOKUP i1 [".go-fuse-epoll-hack"] 20b 2020/09/08 19:21:33 tx 8: OK, {i18446744073709551615 g0 tE=0s tA=0s {M0100644 SZ=0 L=1 0:0 B0*0 i0:18446744073709551615 A 0.000000 M 0.000000 C 0.000000}} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 rx 10: GETATTR i18446744073709551615 {Fh 0} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 tx 10: OK, {tA=0s {M0100644 SZ=0 L=1 0:0 B0*0 i0:18446744073709551615 A 0.000000 M 0.000000 C 0.000000}} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 rx 12: OPEN i18446744073709551615 {O_RDONLY,0x8000} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 tx 12: OK, {Fh 18446744073709551615 } 2020/09/08 19:21:33 rx 14: POLL i18446744073709551615 2020/09/08 19:21:33 tx 14: 38=function not implemented 2020/09/08 19:21:33 rx 16: FLUSH i18446744073709551615 {Fh 18446744073709551615} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 tx 16: 34=numerical result out of range 2020/09/08 19:21:33 rx 18: RELEASE i18446744073709551615 {Fh 18446744073709551615 0x8000 L0} 2020/09/08 19:21:33 tx 18: 34=numerical result out of range Filesystem mounted and ready. Change-Id: Idfaea994ee6a4b8f28acbe8343063f6250cbef35
-
- 25 Jul, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
This provides feedback to file system authors about what we receive from the kernel. This can help figure out which system is to blame for data corruption. Change-Id: I7cd7f340bf705c9972c95cfc6d3d8612f1ce8b34
-
- 18 Jul, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
Use LOOKUP & OPEN instead of CREATE so it also works on read-only mounts. go-fuse/fs$ go test -run TestRoMount -v === RUN TestRoMount 20:31:07.892736 rx 2: INIT i0 {7.31 Ra 0x20000 NO_OPEN_SUPPORT,ASYNC_READ,POSIX_LOCKS,EXPORT_SUPPORT,AUTO_INVAL_DATA,SPLICE_MOVE,SPLICE_READ,HANDLE_KILLPRIV,ABORT_ERROR,EXPLICIT_INVAL_DATA,BIG_WRITES,SPLICE_WRITE,READDIRPLUS,WRITEBACK_CACHE,IOCTL_DIR,READDIRPLUS_AUTO,ASYNC_DIO,PARALLEL_DIROPS,ATOMIC_O_TRUNC,DONT_MASK,FLOCK_LOCKS,POSIX_ACL,MAX_PAGES,CACHE_SYMLINKS,NO_OPENDIR_SUPPORT} 20:31:07.892799 tx 2: OK, {7.28 Ra 0x20000 BIG_WRITES,READDIRPLUS,PARALLEL_DIROPS,ASYNC_READ,AUTO_INVAL_DATA,NO_OPEN_SUPPORT 0/0 Wr 0x10000 Tg 0x0} 20:31:07.892967 rx 4: LOOKUP i1 [".go-fuse-epoll-hack"] 20b 20:31:07.893002 tx 4: OK, {i18446744073709551615 g0 tE=0s tA=0s {M0100644 SZ=0 L=1 0:0 B0*0 i0:18446744073709551615 A 0.000000 M 0.000000 C 0.000000}} 20:31:07.893030 rx 6: OPEN i18446744073709551615 {O_RDONLY,0x8000} 20:31:07.893037 tx 6: OK, {Fh 18446744073709551615 } 20:31:07.893053 rx 8: POLL i18446744073709551615 20:31:07.893059 tx 8: 38=function not implemented 20:31:07.893074 rx 10: FLUSH i18446744073709551615 {Fh 18446744073709551615} 20:31:07.893079 tx 10: 34=numerical result out of range 20:31:07.893131 rx 12: RELEASE i18446744073709551615 {Fh 18446744073709551615 0x8000 L0} 20:31:07.893153 tx 12: 34=numerical result out of range 20:31:07.896705 received ENODEV (unmount request), thread exiting 20:31:07.896719 received ENODEV (unmount request), thread exiting 20:31:07.896888 received ENODEV (unmount request), thread exiting Change-Id: I6de861bdccf03184a4ca3deeefb1cfdc930aabe3 --- PASS: TestRoMount (0.01s) PASS ok github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/v2/fs 0.015s Change-Id: Ic66ca153f5b739e5e081988fdc48d51cde5470f0
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
Currently fails like this 18:13:57.008805 Mount fail: read-only file system because pollHack requires write access. This will be fixed in pollHack in a later commit. Change-Id: I37b459339eda2e8270ca8094455db3ddbf764911
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
Also add a test if "ro" works directly in the fs package. Currently fails like this (will be fixed later): --- FAIL: TestRoMount (0.01s) simple_test.go:116: read-only file syste Change-Id: I8194360b1d092268784b9c2b17de274b86633aa2
-
- 06 Jun, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
Regression test for https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/344 "[v2 API] xfstests generic/257 fails (getdents seek trouble)" Change-Id: Icefab07f6762f8e56de525713facf992797d4435
-
Jakob Unterwurzacher authored
"seeking" works by skipping forward to the requested offset, first rewinding to zero if seeking back. The performance is obviously bad, however, seeking inside a directory does not seem to be too common. I think the solution is good enough until we see a use case where this causes performance issues. Fixes https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/issues/344 Change-Id: Ia7f7fbffaf932c16919eafede6b70f4aff245c25
-
- 03 Apr, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
Change-Id: Ie2aeb012346b2fbcc32de09ea05b39069291d803
-
Han-Wen Nienhuys authored
Change-Id: Ife141f38f2b7598223935963e2916b0b9a609cca
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Commit d0fca860 introduced big lookup lock with the idea to "make sure we don't return forgotten nodes to the kernel". However this way it also started to prevent several Lookup handlers to be running simultaneously, which can deadlock if e.g. Lookup handler somehow synchronizes with other thread which caused the lookup: https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse/commit/d0fca860#commitcomment-37772099 On the surface the fix is easy: if we need to prevent lookups running in parallel to forget, we can turn lookupLock into shared one wrt Lookup, but exclusive wrt Forget. However a more correct fix would be to review nodefs locking completely: there is already per-filesystem treeLock RWMutex, which is _already_ used to synchronize for forgets and lookups. From this point of view lookupLock is unneeded and the correct fix that d0fca860 should have been doing is to correct the scope of treeLock to be used more precisely. However that would be a more intrusive change, and given that nodefs is considered deprecated today, imho it is better to proceed with making lookupLock a shared one. The test that is added deadlocks without provided fix. I suggest not to reject this patch based on rationale that "nodefs is deprecated" as there still are real filesystems that use nodefs. I had not reviewed v2 go-fuse/fs locking yet. Change-Id: I18e01457f474dea31dc17186dfe6db582c2e6337
-