-
Julien Muchembled authored
This was found by the first assertion of answerRebaseObject (client) because a storage node missed a few transactions and reported a conflict with an older serial than the one being stored: this must never happen and this commit adds a more generic assertion on the storage side. The above case is when the "first phase" of replication of a partition (all history up to the tid before unfinished transactions) ended after that the unfinished transactions are finished: this was a corruption bug, where UP_TO_DATE cells could miss data. Otherwise, if the "first phase" ended before, then the partition remained stuck in OUT_OF_DATE state. Restarting the storage node was enough to recover.
7f754b5e