Merge branch 'remove-redundant-js-timeago-pending' into 'master'
Remove redundant js-timeago-pending from user activity log ## What does this MR do? Enables the `skip_js` feature of `time_ago_with_tooltip()` since the frontend was already re-initializing `timeago` on all the elements after it received the data from the backend. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Shouldn't be ## Why was this MR needed? * Reduces bandwidth usage (Reduced by ~3.1kb) * Removes redundant code * Happy DOM🎈 ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21063 ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before (DOM): data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b7d9/6b7d93d515b16415288d5293c07679bee3ad1be2" alt="Screen_Shot_2016-08-18_at_11.14.18_AM" After (DOM): data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43010/430106159045a265be13f2d628832e819004b4b2" alt="Screen_Shot_2016-08-18_at_11.26.51_AM" Before (Bandwidth): data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0602/e06029d71984d4543ae747b0a20f2db8c615a301" alt="Screen_Shot_2016-08-18_at_11.28.24_AM" After (Bandwidth): data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e367/1e36793ba06a6a145abc6c851844d4aed41fba74" alt="Screen_Shot_2016-08-18_at_11.29.49_AM" ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5871
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment