Commit ee4290ad authored by Jan Provaznik's avatar Jan Provaznik

Apply suggestion to doc/user/project/labels.md

parent 817c2c44
......@@ -32,11 +32,13 @@ An issue, epic, or merge request cannot have two scoped labels with the same key
For example, if an issue is already labeled `priority::3` and you apply the label `priority::2` to it,
`priority::3` is automatically removed.
NOTE: **Note:**
In the case where labels have multiple sets of `::`, the longest path is used
for mutual exclusivity check. For example, for label `some::key::value` we
would check for exclusivity on `some::key::` level instead of `some::` - this
allows finer grained organization.
### Labels with multiple colon pairs
If labels have multiple instances of `::`, the longest path from left to right, until the last `::`, is considered the "key" or the "scope".
For example, `nested::key1::value1` and `nested::key1::value2` cannot both exist on the same issue. Adding the latter label will automatically remove the former due to the shared scope of `nested::key1`.
`nested::key1::value1` and `nested::key2::value1` can both exist on the same issue, as these are considered to use two different label scopes, `nested::key1` and `nested::key2`.
### Workflows with scoped labels **[PREMIUM]**
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment