git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35502 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35501 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35500 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35499 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35498 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35497 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35496 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

The fix is probably easy, the tests are just failing because they make
assertions on sequence.get('applied_rule'), but in new simulation this applied
rule is the simulation root applied rule and those assertions will have to be
done on the level below.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35495 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35494 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

was checked on, the UI looked modifiable, and there was no difference in whether
it was possible or not. And, when you changed a value which was delegated, the UI
reports that the change was successful, but in reality the change was discarded.
This interface was horribly confusing. In this commit, I use javascript to add
the attribute readonly in case the checkbox is checked. This makes not possible to
modify a field if the checkbox is checked, in this way, we should be able to
avoid mistakes like before.

I try it on browser with javascript disable and the behaviour is exacly like
before, so this improvement benefit only to those who have javascript enable on
their web browsers.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35493 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35492 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

that's why we observed strange behaviours in field validation and in proxyfield
caches.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35491 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

use INSTANCE_HOME environment variable, which is always set by either runUnitTest.py or zopectl. Also warn when previous dump is not found

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35490 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35489 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* Movement_getPriceCalculationOperandDict must take into account delivery types when getting Trade Conditions.

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35488 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* fix last proxyfication problems in erp5_trade

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35487 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* add new field my_planning_box in order to replace planning_box

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35485 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35484 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35483 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35482 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35481 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

Fix 35479 is not enough to refresh subdocuments


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35480 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

Related to test_owner_local_role_on_clone


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35479 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* finish to proxy SaleOrder_viewSaleOrderFastInputDialog
* rename two fields because field id should not use method names

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35478 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35476 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35475 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35474 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

the condition changable. This fixes a bug tested on
test_tradeModelLineWithEmptyBaseContributionMovement.
Override the condition in PaymentCondition and make PaymentCondition
appliable to any movements.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35473 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35472 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

Fixes test testTradeCondition.test_subcontent_supply_line_reindexing


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35471 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35470 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

The test is supposed to fail, as the proxy field cache does not check the skin
selection. A transaction commit was missing to reproduce the issue.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35469 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

have time to investigate more now, sorry.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35468 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35467 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35466 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35465 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35464 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35463 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35461 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35460 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de