Commit 09a3f66d authored by Juliusz Chroboczek's avatar Juliusz Chroboczek

Explicitly set rp_filter for all interfaces.

It turns out that the rp_filter is only disabled if both all/rp_filter
and ifname/rp_filter are set to 0.  This sets and restores all of these
values explicitly, which fixes mysterious issues on distributions that
set rp_filter by default.

Conflicts:
	kernel_netlink.c
parent ec263a91
......@@ -53,11 +53,23 @@ THE SOFTWARE.
int export_table = -1, import_table = -1;
#ifndef MAX_INTERFACES
#define MAX_INTERFACES 20
#endif
static int old_forwarding = -1;
static int old_ipv4_forwarding = -1;
static int old_accept_redirects = -1;
static int old_rp_filter = -1;
struct old_if {
char *ifname;
int rp_filter;
};
struct old_if old_if[MAX_INTERFACES];
int num_old_if = 0;
static int dgram_socket = -1;
#ifndef ARPHRD_ETHER
......@@ -614,9 +626,58 @@ kernel_setup_socket(int setup)
}
}
static int
get_old_if(const char *ifname)
{
int i;
for(i = 0; i < num_old_if; i++)
if(strcmp(old_if->ifname, ifname) == 0)
return i;
if(num_old_if >= MAX_INTERFACES)
return -1;
old_if[num_old_if].ifname = strdup(ifname);
if(old_if[num_old_if].ifname == NULL)
return -1;
old_if[num_old_if].rp_filter = -1;
return num_old_if++;
}
int
kernel_setup_interface(int setup, const char *ifname, int ifindex)
{
char buf[100];
int i, rc;
/* rp_filter has weird semantics: both all/rp_filter and ifname/rp_filter
must be set to 0 for the rp_filter to be disabled. Deal with it. */
rc = snprintf(buf, 100, "/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/%s/rp_filter", ifname);
if(rc < 0 || rc >= 100)
return -1;
i = get_old_if(ifname);
if(setup) {
if(i >= 0)
old_if[i].rp_filter = read_proc(buf);
else
fprintf(stderr,
"Warning: cannot save old configuration for %s.\n",
ifname);
rc = write_proc(buf, 0);
if(rc < 0)
return -1;
} else {
if(i >= 0 && old_if[i].rp_filter >= 0)
rc = write_proc(buf, old_if[i].rp_filter);
else
rc = -1;
if(rc < 0)
fprintf(stderr,
"Warning: cannot restore old configuration for %s.\n",
ifname);
}
return 1;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment