- 02 Mar, 2023 14 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
In the changes from ExternalMethod 2.13.1 -> 4.5, now ExternalMethod define __code__ (and __defaults__) to a computed attribute calling getFunction, but getFunction is different in our patched class, so when unwrapMethod tries to get __code__, it will raise and mapply will not consider the external method as being callable, so a simple __repr__ of the ExternalMethod will be used as response body when published. By defining __code__ to something using our patched logic, this problem does not happen.
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
Utility function taking care of the internal changes between RestrictedPython v3 and v5, keeping support for both (instead of having multiple if statements).
-
Tatuya Kamada authored
-
Aurel authored
-
Aurel authored
-
Aurel authored
-
Aurel authored
-
Aurel authored
-
Aurel authored
-
Aurel authored
-
Aurel authored
-
Aurel authored
* Emtpy parameter. * No argument.
-
Aurel authored
-
Aurel authored
* "OFS.CopySupport exceptions have been removed: you should use strings instead." * "WSGI is used in place of ZServer." * "StringType must be imported from types" * "'script' is forbidden as python script name"
-
- 01 Mar, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
fcd26be0 (CMFActivity,syncml: stop using a dedicated log file, 2023-02-17) introduced a regression in test and left an unused variable.
-
- 28 Feb, 2023 6 commits
-
-
Roque authored
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
Pandas 0.20.0 introduced a bug fix [1] which changed the behaviour of 'DataFrame.to_records()', so that the resulting Record objects dtype names are unicodes if the data frames column names were unicode. Before this bug fix the dtype names were str, no matter whether the column names were str or unicode. Unfortunately np unpickle breaks if dtype names are unicode [2]. Since many of our data frame columns are unicode, loading arrays often fails. In python3 this isn't a problem anymore, so until then we fix this by introducing a simple monkey patch to pandas, which basically reverts the mentioned bug fix. [1] https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/11879 [2] Small example to reproduce this error: '' import os import numpy as np import pandas as pd r = pd.DataFrame({u'A':[1,2,3]}).to_records() a = np.ndarray(shape=r.shape, dtype=r.dtype.fields) p = "t" try: os.remove(p) except: pass with open(p, 'wb') as f: np.save(f, a) with open(p, 'rb') as f: np.load(f) '' /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1738 /reviewed-by @jerome @klaus
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
Add test which verifies that we can un/pickle 'pd.DataFrame' which were converted to 'np.recarray' via the '.to_records()' method. This test is necessary because it turns out that the combination of pandas >= 0.20.x + python2 doesn't support this functionality by default if the data frames column names are unicodes. Please see nexedi/erp5!1738 (comment 179298) for additional context. /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1738 /reviewed-by @jerome @klaus
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
There are newer pandas versions which still support python2. The latest one which still supports py2 (0.24.x) has initially been released in 2019 and should therefore be quite stable and better supported. We should therefore prepare ERP5 so that it support those newer versions. This patch mostly fixes movements within the internal pandas structure. The patch still supports old object locations of previous pandas versions. /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1738 /reviewed-by @jerome @klaus
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
We already use '.resample.mean()' in some projects. /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1738 /reviewed-by @jerome @klaus
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
In some projects we use pandas resampler inside 'portal_callables' (so with restricted Python). But we miss tests which check whether pandas resamplers are allowed inside the restricted Python. Due to this lack of tests we won't notice whether the usage of pandas resamplers still work with a newer pandas version. With this patch we can recognize if an internal change of pandas makes the resampler unusuable in restricted Python. /reviewed-on !1738 /reviewed-by @jerome @klaus
-
- 27 Feb, 2023 4 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
see b6dcbc19 (l10n_fr,l10n_jp: Fix translation of "Open", 2021-04-30)
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This was old compatibility code
-
Jérome Perrin authored
$INSTANCE_HOME/log only exists in runUnitTest instances, this code had no effect in slapos instances. It is a future problem because it depends on the Signals module (part of ZServer package) and we are removing this dependency in the python 3 port. For the SynchronizationTool, it was even more problematic because it can cause the component not to loed, with an error like: ImportError: erp5.component.tool.SynchronizationTool: cannot load Component SynchronizationTool (signal only works in main thread)
-
- 24 Feb, 2023 4 commits
-
-
Roque authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1745
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1744
-
Sebastien Robin authored
Also, manually handle mouseover for highlighting relation field menu lines instead of using css. Indeed, we have to manually handle possibility that highlight could be done either by mouse or by keyboard.
-
- 23 Feb, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Léo-Paul Géneau authored
-
- 22 Feb, 2023 6 commits
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
For such query with multiple SELECT since mariadb 10.3.38, the error is no longer a "commands out of sync" ProgrammingError, but a simple SQL error during the parsing step - and nothing is executed. Adjust the test to just expect "rror" which would match Error (from ProgrammingError) and "error" from ("you have an error in your SQL syntax")
-
Jérome Perrin authored
- use an explicit table level COLLATE because the default one now appears in the SHOW CREATE TABLE. - SHOW CREATE TABLE no longer have COLLATE on columns
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
Extend test to cover more cases of quantity split move solver
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
The missing workflow resulted in a bug when moving quantities multiple times, first to one delivery, then to another delivery. Then the same solver process with same decision was used as for the first time even if the first delivery was already delivered or movement was deleted. The reason was that Quantity Split Move Solver did not change to succeeded state after solving, so Solver Process did not change to solved state.
-
- 21 Feb, 2023 4 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
No functional change expected.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-