- 07 Jul, 2020 13 commits
-
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
erp5_officejs_support_request_ui_test: Add test to make sure we have all expected actions to access support request web site
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
erp5_officejs_support_request_ui: Search action dynamically according to the action category defined on web site If we always get links from action_object_view, Support Request will always break if we change View Action Category on web site.
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
erp5_officejs_support_request_ui: 'Customer Support Dashboard' in 'Support Requests Dashboard' (in header)
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
Also, remove RSS link from dashboard
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
Also, remove the usage of document.getElementById because we should search only inside the current gadget
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
If we have more than two options to project and resource
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1177
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1182
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
The separation aims to reduce the dependency required to use the macros, where: * erp5_web_renderjs_ui_test contains the tests and the dependencies to run the tests * erp5_web_renderjs_ui_test_core contains the reusable macros, that can be used on other projects to write their own tests.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
This is a first prototype showing how a site rendering can be modified on the style with a renderJS gadget (to remove, add, modify current page elements). The navigation is automatically handle by the javascript (with the pushState API), which really speed up the navigation on powerless machine (like Pinebook Pro).
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
Until now, a reset was performed even though ZODB Components were not created or replaced. Introduce a new installation hook to avoid those useless resets. When installing bootstrap bt5s, erp5_base, erp5_simulation: 33 => 12 resets.
-
- 06 Jul, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Improve consistency with document view
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The changes from !1158 were not so good in ERP5JS, it was good to have the action here: ![stock browser dialog showing Stock as a view action](/uploads/0e9495858295016926da484b6c5fa68f/image.png) and not under "Exports", because this is not an export, it's an interactive report. Also, the "Stock" button is not easy to understand, this is not an action, so we use only an update button now: ![stock browser dialog with only an update action, no action](/uploads/71f40b3e2e951f3c95f7ff885dd91090/image.png) Also, the action button in movement history was confusing, it's not a button where user have to click. It was like this, with a confusing button (but this button was sometimes useful, because with this button we can go back to stock browser): ![movement history before](/uploads/75450d7fbfe1f208ca17e14b22059b38/image.png) Now it's like this, the button is not here, but since the action is now listed in Views, it's easy to go back to stock browser: ![movement history after](/uploads/d66d28f1fc66b69b84baba6d88574afc/image.png) See merge request !1179
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Since 5eb06085 (erp5_web_renderjs_ui: do not display submit and cancel if action is empty in form_dialog., 2020-06-10) ERP5JS does not display submit button, this continues in this direction to: - Apply the same possibility in xhtml_style to not show a submit button when there's no action. In xhtml_style we show the cancel button using the same rules as everywhere else. - Fix error in ERP5JS for dialogs with only an update action but no action. See merge request nexedi/erp5!1181
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Change login button to comply with Google's branding guidelines. Add support for google login in ERP5JS. See merge request nexedi/erp5!1166
-
Jérome Perrin authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1171
-
Jérome Perrin authored
There's nothing wrong in having more than one listbox in a dialog
-
- 03 Jul, 2020 9 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The initial intention was to "disallow invalidated", without forcing users to validate everything, but it was probably a mistake, if users don't need to validate then validation workflow would be a bit meaningless. This is made after an incident where a user mistakenly cloned a validated currency and the cloned currency was available everywhere in the system. Change to not return draft currencies by default and also change so that all items are tuple, for consistency. That should have no impact and is a bit easier for the test. Also adjust accounting_ui_test, we need to validate currencies for the tests and clear cache if we validated some (but we don't need to clear cache if we validate accounts, because account caches is more clever and does not need to clear all cache)
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
also, we don't send passwords by email
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Since the workflow is linear, make sure the states and transitions are sorted in the listboxs in same order as workflow, this makes re-configuring the workflow a bit easier.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The views for States and Transitions have an `int_index` field, but the property sheet was missing.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The term is "Region", not "Country"
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Unused aq_base imported from Acquisition (unused-import)
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1176
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
WebDAVSupport module was migrated to ZODB Components in 21becf4c. This module contains a monkey patch (5c7d50d5) on webdav.NullResource.PUT which should really be in Products.ERP5Type.patches and was not applied anymore since the migration.
-
- 02 Jul, 2020 10 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This is not a dialog where user can do an action, it's just a dialog where user can change the parameters and update the to see the stock levels, so this should be using only an update action (now that this is supported).
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This is the view when using drill down on stock browser, there's no action here, this is not a dialog where user can "Do something" so a button to "Do something" is meaningless. One reason for this button was to be able to go back to stock browser, but: - in ERP5JS, user can go back to stock browser by clicking again on "Stock" action from Views actions. - In erp5_xhtml_style, user can click the list header or breadcrumb.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
In ERP5JS we want the "interactive reports" to be available like other view actions, directly in the left side panel. Also "Report" are named "Export" in this interface (which might actually be a mistake, but it's like this now). Rendering a form_dialog in a view action works perfectly in ERP5JS, so we can take advantage of this. In xhtml_style, this can not be a object_view action, because object_view actions can not use form_dialog, this breaks the navigation. So split in two actions, to have the best of both worlds
-
Jérome Perrin authored
In that case the action button is not displayed. If there's an update action defined on the form settings, update button is displayed. Cancel button is displayed using the same rule as any dialogs (ie. everytime there's a cancel_url in request)
-
Jérome Perrin authored
update should still be usable in this case
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
testUpgradeInstanceWithOldDataFs: Upgrade erp5_upgrader too (it was in keep list until now) as old Data.fs contains ERP5UpgraderUtils Extension with import of Products.ERP5Type.Log. Although, erp5_upgrader should probably be automatically upgraded before even starting the upgrade...
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-