Commit 062b151a authored by Marcel Amirault's avatar Marcel Amirault Committed by Suzanne Selhorn

First phase of keyword documenation revamp

Make the difference between job and global keywords
clearer, and fix incorrect nesting and placement
of some keywords
parent d2f77e36
......@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ be checked to make sure the jobs are added to the correct pipeline type. For
example, if a merge request pipeline did not run, the jobs may have been added to
a branch pipeline instead.
It's also possible that your [`workflow: rules`](yaml/README.md#workflowrules) configuration
It's also possible that your [`workflow: rules`](yaml/README.md#workflow) configuration
blocked the pipeline, or allowed the wrong pipeline type.
### A job runs unexpectedly
......@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ clause, multiple pipelines may run. Usually this occurs when you push a commit t
a branch that has an open merge request associated with it.
To [prevent duplicate pipelines](yaml/README.md#avoid-duplicate-pipelines), use
[`workflow: rules`](yaml/README.md#workflowrules) or rewrite your rules to control
[`workflow: rules`](yaml/README.md#workflow) or rewrite your rules to control
which pipelines can run.
### Console workaround if job using resource_group gets stuck
......
This diff is collapsed.
......@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ as much as possible.
## Overview
Pipelines for the GitLab project are created using the [`workflow:rules` keyword](../ci/yaml/README.md#workflowrules)
Pipelines for the GitLab project are created using the [`workflow:rules` keyword](../ci/yaml/README.md#workflow)
feature of the GitLab CI/CD.
Pipelines are always created for the following scenarios:
......
......@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ code_quality:
- if: '$CI_COMMIT_TAG || $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH'
```
If you are using merge request pipelines, your `rules` (or [`workflow: rules`](../../../ci/yaml/README.md#workflowrules))
If you are using merge request pipelines, your `rules` (or [`workflow: rules`](../../../ci/yaml/README.md#workflow))
might look like this example:
```yaml
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment