Commit 5c93bdbe authored by Thong Kuah's avatar Thong Kuah

Optimize query performance in specific case

This becomes especially bad in this query from /api/v4/projects
endpoint:

```
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
  (SELECT 1 AS one
   FROM "projects"
   WHERE (EXISTS
            (SELECT 1
             FROM "project_authorizations"
             WHERE "project_authorizations"."user_id" = 1
               AND (project_authorizations.project_id = projects.id)
            )
            OR projects.visibility_level IN (10,20)
          )
     AND "projects"."visibility_level" = 0
     AND "projects"."pending_delete" = FALSE
   LIMIT 10001) subquery_for_count
```

Note we attempt to limit the damage with `LIMIT 10001` but Postgres
keeps trying to find any row that will match the impossible visiblity
level combination of (10,20) & (0), which goes way beyond 10001 rows.

So we omit the OR in the case where we encounter a visibility level
set which is null.
parent 4db49e24
......@@ -82,7 +82,29 @@ class ProjectsFinder < UnionFinder
if private_only?
current_user.authorized_projects
else
Project.public_or_visible_to_user(current_user)
default_visibility_levels = Gitlab::VisibilityLevel.levels_for_user(current_user)
# This is an optimization - surprisingly PostgreSQL does not optimize
# for this.
#
# If the default visiblity level and desired visiblity level filter
# cancels each other out, don't use the SQL clause for visibility level.
# In fact, this then becames equivalent to just authorized projects for
# the user.
#
# E.g.
# (EXISTS(<authorized_projects>) OR projects.visibility_level IN (10,20))
# AND "projects"."visibility_level" = 0
#
# is essentially
# EXISTS(<authorized_projects>) AND "projects"."visibility_level" = 0
#
# See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/37007
if params[:visibility_level].present? && !default_visibility_levels.include?(params[:visibility_level])
current_user.authorized_projects
else
Project.public_or_visible_to_user(current_user)
end
end
end
end
......
---
title: Optimize query when Projects API requests private visibility level
merge_request: 20594
author:
type: performance
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment