Commit 873ee852 authored by Amy Qualls's avatar Amy Qualls

Merge branch 'docs-bprescott/20210817-x509tshoot' into 'master'

Troubleshooting x509 signing

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!68373
parents 46c10594 3628f61f
......@@ -23,12 +23,18 @@ GitLab uses its own certificate store and therefore defines the trust chain.
For a commit or tag to be *verified* by GitLab:
- The signing certificate email must match a verified email address used by the committer in GitLab.
- The Certificate Authority has to be trusted by the GitLab instance, see also
[Omnibus install custom public certificates](https://docs.gitlab.com/omnibus/settings/ssl.html#install-custom-public-certificates).
- The signing certificate email must match a verified email address in GitLab.
- The GitLab instance must be able to establish a full trust chain from the certificate
in the signature to a trusted certificate in the GitLab certificate store. This chain
may include intermediate certificates supplied in the signature. Additional
certificates, such as the Certificate Authority root,
[may need to be added to the GitLab certificate store](https://docs.gitlab.com/omnibus/settings/ssl.html#install-custom-public-certificates).
- The signing time has to be within the time range of the [certificate validity](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5280.html#section-4.1.2.5)
which is usually up to three years.
- The signing time is equal or later than commit time.
- If the status of a commit has already been determined and stored in the database,
[use the Rake task to re-check the status](../../../../raketasks/x509_signatures.md).
[Read more about this and detailed troubleshooting steps](#troubleshooting).
NOTE:
Certificate revocation lists are checked on a daily basis via background worker.
......@@ -152,3 +158,196 @@ To verify that a tag is signed, you can use the `--verify` flag:
```shell
git tag --verify v1.1.1
```
## Troubleshooting
### Re-verify commits
GitLab stores the status of any checked commits in the database. You can use a
Rake task to [check the status of any previously checked commits](../../../../raketasks/x509_signatures.md).
After you make any changes, run this command:
```shell
sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:x509:update_signatures
```
### Main verification checks
The code performs
[six key checks](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v14.1.0-ee/lib/gitlab/x509/signature.rb#L33),
which all must return `verified`:
- `x509_certificate.nil?` should be false.
- `x509_certificate.revoked?` should be false.
- `verified_signature` should be true.
- `user.nil?`should be false.
- `user.verified_emails.include?(@email)` should be true.
- `certificate_email == @email` should be true.
To investigate why a commit shows as `Unverified`:
1. [Start a Rails console](../../../../administration/operations/rails_console.md#starting-a-rails-console-session):
```shell
sudo gitlab-rails console
```
1. Identify the project (either by path or ID) and full commit SHA that you're investigating.
Use this information to create `signature` to run other checks against:
```ruby
project = Project.find_by_full_path('group/subgroup/project')
project = Project.find_by_id('121')
commit = project.repository.commit_by(oid: '87fdbd0f9382781442053b0b76da729344e37653')
signedcommit=Gitlab::X509::Commit.new(commit)
signature=Gitlab::X509::Signature.new(signedcommit.signature_text, signedcommit.signed_text, commit.committer_email, commit.created_at)
```
If you make changes to address issues identified running through the checks, restart the
Rails console and run though the checks again from the start.
1. Check the certificate on the commit:
```ruby
signature.x509_certificate.nil?
signature.x509_certificate.revoked?
```
Both checks should return `false`:
```ruby
> signature.x509_certificate.nil?
=> false
> signature.x509_certificate.revoked?
=> false
```
A [known issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/332503) causes
these checks to fail with `Validation failed: Subject key identifier is invalid`.
1. Run a cryptographic check on the signature. The code must return `true`:
```ruby
signature.verified_signature
```
If it returns `false` then [investigate this check further](#cryptographic-verification-checks).
1. Confirm the email addresses match on the commit and the signature:
- The Rails console displays the email addresses being compared.
- The final command must return `true`:
```ruby
sigemail=signature.__send__:certificate_email
commitemail=commit.committer_email
sigemail == commitemail
```
A [known issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/336677) exists:
only the first email in the `Subject Alternative Name` list is compared. To
display the `Subject Alternative Name` list, run:
```ruby
signature.__send__ :get_certificate_extension,'subjectAltName'
```
If the developer's email address is not the first one in the list, this check
will not work, and the commit will be `unverified`.
1. The email address on the commit must be associated with an account in GitLab.
This check should return `false`:
```ruby
signature.user.nil?
```
1. Check the email address is associated with a user in GitLab. This check should
return a user, such as `#<User id:1234 @user_handle>`:
```ruby
User.find_by_any_email(commit.committer_email)
```
If it returns `nil`, the email address is not associated with a user, and the check fails.
1. Confirm the developer's email address is verified. This check must return true:
```ruby
signature.user.verified_emails.include?(commit.committer_email)
```
If the previous check returned `nil`, this command displays an error:
```plaintext
NoMethodError (undefined method `verified_emails' for nil:NilClass)
```
1. The verification status is stored in the database. To display the database record:
```ruby
pp X509CommitSignature.by_commit_sha(commit.sha);nil
```
If all the previous checks returned the correct values:
- `verification_status: "unverified"` indicates the database record needs
updating. [Use the Rake task](#re-verify-commits).
- `[]` indicates the database doesn't have a record yet. Locate the commit
in GitLab to check the signature and store the result.
#### Cryptographic verification checks
If GitLab determines that `verified_signature` is `false`, investigate the reason
in the Rails console. These checks require `signature` to exist. Refer to the `signature`
step of the previous [main verification checks](#main-verification-checks).
1. Check the signature, without checking the issuer, returns `true`:
```ruby
signature.__send__ :valid_signature?
```
1. Check the signing time and date. This check must return `true`:
```ruby
signature.__send__ :valid_signing_time?
```
- The code allows for code signing certificates to expire.
- A commit must be signed during the validity period of the certificate,
and at or after the commit's datestamp. Display the commit time and
certificate details including `not_before`, `not_after` with:
```ruby
commit.created_at
pp signature.__send__ :cert; nil
```
1. Check the signature, including that TLS trust can be established. This check must return `true`:
```ruby
signature.__send__(:p7).verify([], signature.__send__(:cert_store), signature.__send__(:signed_text))
```
1. If this fails, add the missing certificate(s) required to establish trust
[to the GitLab certificate store](https://docs.gitlab.com/omnibus/settings/ssl.html#install-custom-public-certificates).
1. After adding more certificates, (if these troubleshooting steps then pass)
run the Rake task to [re-verify commits](#re-verify-commits).
1. Display the certificates, including in the signature:
```ruby
pp signature.__send__(:p7).certificates ; nil
```
Ensure any additional intermediate certificate(s) and the root certificate are added
to the certificate store. For consistency with how certificate chains are built on
web servers, Git clients that are signing commits should include the certificate
and all intermediate certificates in the signature, and the GitLab certificate
store should only contain the root. If you remove a root certificate from the GitLab
trust store, such as when it expires, commit signatures which chain back to that
root display as `unverified`.
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment