part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23036

Remove unnecessary require_relative calls from service classes.

See merge request !7601

Add node_modules cache to npm related builds

See merge request !7548

Rails by default use autoload for all dirs from app folder.
require_relative not needed. See ActiveSupport::Dependencies.autoload_paths

Fix StrongAttibutes error with Ruby 2.1

Closes #24730

See merge request !7625

Backport SmartInterval, PrettyTime, SubbableResource from EE.

## What does this MR do?

Backports infrastructure used for EE-only Timetracking so it can be used and improved upon in CE. 

This doesn't really need review... it was already reviewed and merged in EE. 

There are no side effects or conflicts, just three new classes added:

1. `SubbableResource` -- pubsub for ajax resources
2. `SmartInterval`-- for configurable polling
3. `PrettyTime` -- time parsing and formatting utility methods

- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/985

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/870

cc: @jschatz1

See merge request !7573

Restricted visibility buttons to checkboxes

## What does this MR do?

Changes the `Restricted visibility levels` settings to use checkboxes instead of a button group.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_19.25.48](/uploads/0c6ee415ee0c89c0a7e3ffd98f88df71/Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_19.25.48.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #18136

See merge request !7463

Issues empty state

## What does this MR do?

Adds the empty state for the project, dashboard and group issues.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

## Screenshots (if relevant)

### Filtered to show no issues (on group issues page in this case but also dashboard and projects)

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.55.56](/uploads/b598af4a8a5e2c9fbb859abf36e70e4b/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.55.56.png)

### Project with no issues

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.08](/uploads/8f54fdf1b3101c46299249fa2944207d/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.08.png)

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.17](/uploads/1d2d162e1d845dd05e945d8ebb1d2101/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.17.png)

### Group with no projects with any issues

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.54.55](/uploads/f28dc2038839d5bda0eb37f37927d5db/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.54.55.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #20840 

Closes #20850

See merge request !7309

Cycle analytics second iteration frontend

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Mostly typos and code guidelines.

## Why was this MR needed?
This implements the frontend part of !6859 for #23449

## Screenshots

**Initial view**
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_5.28.43_PM](/uploads/ff9cfa9c9d6c2da28c24e03e384f89af/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_5.28.43_PM.png)

**Cycle Analytics with data**
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.09.24_PM](/uploads/18d9786c090bdd554cf786c879543302/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.09.24_PM.png)

**User doesn't have access for a stage**
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.11.01_PM](/uploads/d1ea76a63f2de2224954b5f40038c488/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.11.01_PM.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #23449

See merge request !7366

Make milestone page responsive

Credit to @yury-n for this one. ⭐ 🌟 ⭐  Original MR: !5255

## What does this MR do?

> Makes the milestone page more mobile friendly

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

> Shouldn't be but maybe double check that the views I changed are exclusively used by the milestone details page I was amending and not any other pages that I haven't tested after my changes.

Looks good to me. :) Would be awesome to have @annabeldunstone check up on the stylesheet updates.

## Why was this MR needed?

> Buttons were misaligned

> Progress bar was not 100% width

> Stats were cut in the middle

> Milestone name/date text overflow

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.37.49_PM](/uploads/4da67c9f81d71873188e4a5cafed8113/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.37.49_PM.png)

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.41.58_PM](/uploads/b3d767ce49e37b251c3192ed051400b8/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.41.58_PM.png)

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.46.41_PM](/uploads/353ad59a88f3dea9e3f88e6ea05c1af3/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.46.41_PM.png)

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_6.15.58_PM](/uploads/a26768701ea6cb00ccd85a5ac0772e36/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_6.15.58_PM.png)

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.57.04_PM](/uploads/b94cf1b7593589948216342b48a19831/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.57.04_PM.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #18852

See merge request !6655

Fix migration paths

This fixes `migration paths` failure, preventing the `knapsack` from auto-balancing test suites:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/6485942

cc @stanhu

See merge request !7640

This reverts commit 23fc7875.

Improve deploy message

## What does this MR do?
Improves deploy message to make it more descriptive and useable then what is already offered by deploy command.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !7629

Evalute time_ago method instead of printing it

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34](/uploads/295ffa522865fe1865b0c0b552a49ebf/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34.png)

See merge request !7634

Fix 500 error when group name ends with git

Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/support-forum/issues/1298
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/24742

See merge request !7630

Add deploy chat command

This adds a new ChatOps command:
```
/trigger deploy <environment> to <environment>
```

See merge request !7619

Send registry address with build payload

## What does this MR do?

Adds `registry_url` as a part of a build payload, when sending a response to a GitLab Runner which requested a new build.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Change in `lib/ci/api/entities.rb`.

## Why was this MR needed?

This is one of the steps needed to add support for private/protected registries hosted with GitLab CE/EE.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Related to gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner#1828, gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner!386, gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner#1434

See merge request !7474

This is to avoid prompting the same dialog for people who already dismissed the dialog.

Fix permissions error

## What does this MR do?
Gives the permissions to the child row in order to render it properly.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !7627

Resolve "Activity entries are not loaded fully to cover full window's height"

## What does this MR do?

Fixes a bug in which a browser window large enough to encompass the default number of items in an auto-loading endless-scroll list could not trigger the loading of additional items.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

I refactored activities.js and pager.js into es6 syntax while I was investigating the issue.  No changes were made other than some es6 flourishes and eslint conformity, so nothing should be effected, but perhaps best to double check other pages which utilize these scripts.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![endless-scroll-fixed](/uploads/b672b606826af745528c209ab6cfe95c/endless-scroll-fixed.gif)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #24499

See merge request !7608

Fix errors happening when source branch of merge request is removed and then restored

See merge request !7568

Review changes

Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>