Remove suggested colors hover underline

## What does this MR do?
* Removes the blue hover underline for the suggested color containers 
* Added `cursor: pointer` to the suggested color containers  

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be 😄 

## Why was this MR needed?
Improves UI

## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
![DS48AvgSVX](/uploads/0077e7a5837c8ce9fe2493ad6a42a018/DS48AvgSVX.gif)

After:
![olZzS68WNr](/uploads/4e0ae808c69942a528f1303df8cddeae/olZzS68WNr.gif)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21792

See merge request !6165

Fix alignment of icon buttons

## What does this MR do?

Fix misalignment of buttons with only an icon which was introduced by !5451.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5451#note_14066627

## Screenshots

### Before

![with-text](/uploads/aa7f7a98e2015070689e762e0cf99844/witht-text.png)

![without-text](/uploads/72db7c54e3961fd0df34b0ea79455fd0/without-text.png)

### After

![with-text](/uploads/3f19e55773083bcb22f3909f6dc0d147/witht-text.png)

![without-text](/uploads/b6647d4d71eb5cd9d1712908d2b93665/without-text.png)


See merge request !5887

Fix markdown anchor icon interaction

## What does this MR do?
Fixes and improves the markdown anchor icon interaction so that hovering over any headers (generated through markdown) will have an anchor icon that's easily accessible (won't hide from you on edge cases), replaced the icon with fontAwesome icon and added more padding for the anchor icon.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
1.  Need to check if it's okay to replace the icon-link.png with fontAwesome
2. Need to check if it's okay for the additional view padding on views that render markdown to compensate for anchor link space
3. Need to check if there are any other views that render markdown that did not have it's padding re-adjusted

## Why was this MR needed?
Improve markdown rendered anchor links so that they are more user friendly

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20459 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-30_at_2.31.43_PM](/uploads/12b2aad7f130d26a709ff28083ecc2e3/Screen_Shot_2016-07-30_at_2.31.43_PM.png)

After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-08_at_10.25.06_AM](/uploads/caac1985cfbd305b8c8665d86e30ab24/Screen_Shot_2016-08-08_at_10.25.06_AM.png)

Before:
![https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/uploads/45e6d0aee7abbdb42a4c781ae0ba1961/ws7MBrK70g.gif](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/uploads/45e6d0aee7abbdb42a4c781ae0ba1961/ws7MBrK70g.gif)

After:
![nLQOMn9RUO](/uploads/3905ceac2d591399d14cec1b3319f46b/nLQOMn9RUO.gif)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5577

Added `.term-bold` declaration.

## What does this MR do?

Added `.term-bold` declaration.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21471#note_14874299

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #21471

See merge request !6171

Align add button on repository view

## What does this MR do?
Top aligns the add button to the other UI elements adjacent to it 😄 

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be

## Why was this MR needed?
Fixes a UI inconsistency 

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21168 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_3.53.00_PM__2_](/uploads/5d6d765bb8a1d640170805ec32956790/Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_3.53.00_PM__2_.png)

After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_3.52.44_PM__2_](/uploads/1db9f0f68ef5defa4dd111d7dae1dc26/Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_3.52.44_PM__2_.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5971

Convert datetime coffeescript spec to ES6

## What does this MR do?
Converts the last remnant coffeescript file to ES6

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
None

## Why was this MR needed?
Because we aren't using coffeescript anymore 🎈 

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#21472 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
None

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !6045

Hides merge request section in edit project when disabled

## What does this MR do?

Correctly hides the merge request section in the project edit page when disabled. It used to work before the feature visibility part was changed to dropdown - so added a test to prevent in future! 👍 

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![hide](/uploads/eb72ef87bad19c2716472a0c1031fd32/hide.gif)

See merge request !6175

Commit message blocks

#### What does this MR do?
* Wraps code commit message blocks
* Consolidates similar shades of gray (cc @cperessini @tauriedavis)

Related to #20831 

#### Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:  
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-19_at_10.41.07_AM](/uploads/4529d178123e18b0aad35a252061902b/Screen_Shot_2016-08-19_at_10.41.07_AM.png)
After: 
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-19_at_10.40.42_AM](/uploads/499818f360e7c3cd9d31bc335cae1a82/Screen_Shot_2016-08-19_at_10.40.42_AM.png)



See merge request !5906

Fix expiration date picker after update

@DouweM this object is now on `gl`, not on the window. It would only break when trying to use the date picker on a newly-inserted member element, but I figure it's probably worth sneaking into a patch.

See merge request !6184

Moved builds panel to the bottom of the builds sidemenu (and change retry link colour)

## What does this MR do?

Moves the builds panel to the bottom of the builds sidemenu.

Changes the `Retry` link to look more _linky_. 🖇  

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

On small screens, the builds panel must be scrolled through before you can get to the details of the build you're looking at.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #21122

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-08-20_at_17.41.51](/uploads/84f10c43011da514ef8ac1b1d20eb5d5/Screen_Shot_2016-08-20_at_17.41.51.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
Closes #21122

See merge request !5923

Handle error on trace raw download with old builds (DB stored)

## What does this MR do?

Handles error on `raw build trace` download action for old builds (which are stored in DB instead of file).

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

No.

## Why was this MR needed?

At the beginning build traces were stored in database but at some point we moved to store them in files. All trace related actions are aware of this, but not `raw trace download`.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Fixes #18900

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?


- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !4822

Fix GitLab import button

cc @MrChrisW  

Closes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#21795

See merge request !6167

Rename behaviour to behavior in bug issue template for consistency

## What does this MR do?
Rename `behaviour` to` behavior` in bug issue template for consistency

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
None

## Why was this MR needed?
Consistency 👍🏻 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
None

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21789

See merge request !6166

Prepend blank line to close message on merge request

## What does this MR do?
Adds a new line above the "Closes" message on a merge request.

## Why was this MR needed?
Autoappended `Closes` to the end of merge request needs a new line in the beginning. When using descriptive commit messages and the commit message body is used for the body of the merge request the Closes message should appear on a line by itself.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#21710

See merge request !6151

Minor edits to two_factor_recovery_codes API error catching

Minor fixes to the `two_factor_recovery_codes` internal API making the conditionals more sane.  Thanks @DouweM for pointing it out.

See merge request !6000

Move CHANGELOG entry for !5858 from 8.11 to 8.12

## What does this MR do?

Fix CHANGELOG entry of !5858

See merge request !6178

Remove green outline from `New branch unavailable` button on issue page

## What does this MR do?

- remove mistakenly added green outline from `New branch unavailable` button on issue page
- remove mistakenly added green outline from `Checking branches...` button on issue page

## Why was this MR needed?

`New branch unavailable` and `Checking branches...` buttons had green outline though that should only be added to the `New branch` button.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

fixes #21006

## Screenshots

### Before

![before-checking](/uploads/f37f62c99602143d7ddc27fead4035c5/before-checking.png)

![before-new-branch](/uploads/4926f7c57b97831496c79b4176ad02a3/before-new-branch.png)

![before-unavailable](/uploads/041c32fa7eef86403c3ee749d4f1131a/before-unavailable.png)

### After

![after-checking](/uploads/918484eca0ccda2d27a8bb3e08a569fb/after-checking.png)

![after-new-branch](/uploads/ae380933d3e82117c887dabfb06a915a/after-new-branch.png)

![after-unavailable](/uploads/d861b3b379de404c62cf27a7207b005c/after-unavailable.png)

See merge request !5858

Update memory requirements docs

## What does this MR do?
It doubles the memory requirements in the docs.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
N/A

## Why was this MR needed?
To reflect the requirements for decent operation, until we bring such requirements down.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/infrastructure/issues/19

## Screenshots (if relevant)
N/A

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [] ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- ~~Tests~~
  - [ ] ~~Added for this feature/bug~~
  - [ ] ~~All builds are passing~~
- [ ] ~~Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)~~
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !6016

Change the inline code to codeblocks for the new features doc guideline

Change the inline code to codeblocks for the new features doc guideline
for better clarity.

See merge request !6168

[ci skip]

Update CHANGELOG with 8.11.4 entries.



See merge request !6159

Remove inconsistent font weight for sidebar's labels

## What does this MR do?
Removes the `.bold` css class from the sidebar label default value so that it is no longer bold 😄 

**None** => None

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
None

## Why was this MR needed?
Fixes a UI inconsistency

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21141 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_9.41.11_AM](/uploads/3e416d45531b7322474922c569225c03/Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_9.41.11_AM.png)

After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_9.40.57_AM](/uploads/a4d60d4cd0a57142ad6c0c8a25be5342/Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_9.40.57_AM.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5984

Fix inconsistent checkbox alignment

## What does this MR do?
Vertically aligns the checkboxes to the top so that it is aligned with the issue titles

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
None

## Why was this MR needed?
Fixes existing UI inconsistency

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21398

## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-25_at_12.43.21_PM](/uploads/c494d6200e2068feb324db932851cdc0/Screen_Shot_2016-08-25_at_12.43.21_PM.png)

After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-25_at_12.41.51_PM](/uploads/42241a150c886592ff92a5840090c589/Screen_Shot_2016-08-25_at_12.41.51_PM.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !6032

Front End - Rewrote ES5 `user.js` to ES6 `user.js.es6`

## What does this MR do?

This MR removes the `users.js` file in `app/assets/javascripts/users.js` and replaces it with ES6.

* It also adds the file extension `.es6` so that the sprockets babel gem can transpile it to ES5.
* The new file is: `users.js.es6` in `app/assets/javascripts/`
* Replaced `new User` with `new gl.User` in `app/views/users/show.html.haml`

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

I followed the AirBnb guide, but if there are any mistakes let me know!

## Why was this MR needed?

Because the entire coffee script codebase was transferred over to ES5 with a plan to move everything over to ES6 😄 

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

#20098 

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5676