-
James Bottomley authored
It has been reported that some TIS based TPMs are giving unexpected errors when using the O_NONBLOCK path of the TPM device. The problem is that some TPMs don't like it when you get and then relinquish a locality (as the tpm_try_get_ops()/tpm_put_ops() pair does) without sending a command. This currently happens all the time in the O_NONBLOCK write path. Fix this by moving the tpm_try_get_ops() further down the code to after the O_NONBLOCK determination is made. This is safe because the priv->buffer_mutex still protects the priv state being modified. BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206275 Fixes: d23d1248 ("tpm: fix invalid locking in NONBLOCKING mode") Reported-by: Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> Tested-by: Alex Guzman <alex@guzman.io> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
78628402