-
NeilBrown authored
Currently svc_sock_names calls svc_close_xprt on a svc_sock to which it does not own a reference. As soon as svc_close_xprt sets XPT_CLOSE, the socket could be freed by a separate thread (though this is a very unlikely race). It is safer to hold a reference while calling svc_close_xprt. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
3942302e