This is one of two patches which are to correct possible circular
locking between mm->mmap_sem and nilfs->ns_segctor_sem.

The problem was detected by lockdep check as follows:

 =======================================================
 [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
 2.6.30-rc3-nilfs-00002-g3552613 #6
 -------------------------------------------------------
 mmap/5418 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem){++++.+}, at: [<d0d0e852>] nilfs_transaction_begin+0xb6/0x10c [nilfs2]

 but task is already holding lock:
 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<c043700a>] do_page_fault+0x1d8/0x30a

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
 [<c01470a5>] __lock_acquire+0x1066/0x13b0
 [<c01474a9>] lock_acquire+0xba/0xdd
 [<c01836bc>] might_fault+0x68/0x88
 [<c023c730>] copy_to_user+0x2c/0xfc
 [<d0d11b4f>] nilfs_ioctl_wrap_copy+0x103/0x160 [nilfs2]
 [<d0d11fa9>] nilfs_ioctl+0x30a/0x3b0 [nilfs2]
 [<c01a3be7>] vfs_ioctl+0x22/0x69
 [<c01a408e>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x460/0x499
 [<c01a4107>] sys_ioctl+0x40/0x5a
 [<c01031a4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
 [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff

 -> #0 (&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem){++++.+}:
 [<c0146e0b>] __lock_acquire+0xdcc/0x13b0
 [<c01474a9>] lock_acquire+0xba/0xdd
 [<c0433f1d>] down_read+0x2a/0x3e
 [<d0d0e852>] nilfs_transaction_begin+0xb6/0x10c [nilfs2]
 [<d0cfe0e5>] nilfs_page_mkwrite+0xe7/0x154 [nilfs2]
 [<c0183b0b>] __do_fault+0x165/0x376
 [<c01855cd>] handle_mm_fault+0x287/0x5d1
 [<c043712d>] do_page_fault+0x2fb/0x30a
 [<c0435462>] error_code+0x72/0x78
 [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff

 other info that might help us debug this:

 1 lock held by mmap/5418:
 #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<c043700a>] do_page_fault+0x1d8/0x30a

 stack backtrace:
 Pid: 5418, comm: mmap Not tainted 2.6.30-rc3-nilfs-00002-g3552613 #6
 Call Trace:
 [<c0432145>] ? printk+0xf/0x12
 [<c0145c48>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xaa/0xb5
 [<c0146e0b>] __lock_acquire+0xdcc/0x13b0
 [<d0d10149>] ? nilfs_sufile_get_stat+0x1e/0x105 [nilfs2]
 [<c013b59a>] ? up_read+0x16/0x2c
 [<d0d10225>] ? nilfs_sufile_get_stat+0xfa/0x105 [nilfs2]
 [<c01474a9>] lock_acquire+0xba/0xdd
 [<d0d0e852>] ? nilfs_transaction_begin+0xb6/0x10c [nilfs2]
 [<c0433f1d>] down_read+0x2a/0x3e
 [<d0d0e852>] ? nilfs_transaction_begin+0xb6/0x10c [nilfs2]
 [<d0d0e852>] nilfs_transaction_begin+0xb6/0x10c [nilfs2]
 [<d0cfe0e5>] nilfs_page_mkwrite+0xe7/0x154 [nilfs2]
 [<c0183b0b>] __do_fault+0x165/0x376
 [<c01855cd>] handle_mm_fault+0x287/0x5d1
 [<c043700a>] ? do_page_fault+0x1d8/0x30a
 [<c013b54f>] ? down_read_trylock+0x39/0x43
 [<c043712d>] do_page_fault+0x2fb/0x30a
 [<c0436e32>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x30a
 [<c0435462>] error_code+0x72/0x78
 [<c0436e32>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x30a

This makes the lock granularity of nilfs->ns_segctor_sem finer than
that of the mmap semaphore for ioctl commands except
nilfs_clean_segments().

The successive patch ("nilfs2: fix lock order reversal in
nilfs_clean_segments ioctl") is required to fully resolve the problem.
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>