I do not see how one can effectively use skb_insert() without holding
some kind of lock. Otherwise other cpus could have changed the list
right before we have a chance of acquiring list->lock.

Only existing user is in drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes_mgt.c and this
one probably meant to use __skb_insert() since it appears nesqp->pau_list
is protected by nesqp->pau_lock. This looks like nesqp->pau_lock
could be removed, since nesqp->pau_list.lock could be used instead.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@intel.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>