-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
If new dentry block is allocated and its i_size is updated, we should update its inode block together in order to sync i_size and its block allocation. Otherwise, we can loose additional dentry block due to the unconsistent i_size. Errorneous Scenario ------------------- In the recovery routine, - recovery_dentry | - __f2fs_add_link | | - get_new_data_page | | | - i_size_write(new_i_size) | | | - mark_inode_dirty_sync(dir) | | - update_parent_metadata | | | - mark_inode_dirty(dir) | - write_checkpoint - sync_dirty_dir_inodes - filemap_flush(dentry_blocks) - f2fs_write_data_page - skip to write the last dentry block due to index < i_size In the above flow, new_i_size is not updated to its inode block so that the last dentry block will be lost accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
699489bb