[ Upstream commit 583da48e ]

When growing raid5 device on machine with small memory, there is chance that
mdadm will be killed and the following bug report can be observed. The same
bug could also be reproduced in linux-4.10.6.

[57600.075774] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
[57600.083796] IP: [<ffffffff81a6aa87>] _raw_spin_lock+0x7/0x20
[57600.110378] PGD 421cf067 PUD 4442d067 PMD 0
[57600.114678] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
[57600.180799] CPU: 1 PID: 25990 Comm: mdadm Tainted: P           O    4.2.8 #1
[57600.187849] Hardware name: To be filled by O.E.M. To be filled by O.E.M./MAHOBAY, BIOS QV05AR66 03/06/2013
[57600.197490] task: ffff880044e47240 ti: ffff880043070000 task.ti: ffff880043070000
[57600.204963] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81a6aa87>]  [<ffffffff81a6aa87>] _raw_spin_lock+0x7/0x20
[57600.213057] RSP: 0018:ffff880043073810  EFLAGS: 00010046
[57600.218359] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000000c RCX: ffff88011e296dd0
[57600.225486] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffe8ffffcb46c0 RDI: 0000000000000000
[57600.232613] RBP: ffff880043073878 R08: ffff88011e5f8170 R09: 0000000000000282
[57600.239739] R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 28f5c28f5c28f5c3 R12: ffff880043073838
[57600.246872] R13: ffffe8ffffcb46c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8800b9706a00
[57600.253999] FS:  00007f576106c700(0000) GS:ffff88011e280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[57600.262078] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[57600.267817] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000428fe000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
[57600.274942] Stack:
[57600.276949]  ffffffff8114ee35 ffff880043073868 0000000000000282 000000000000eb3f
[57600.284383]  ffffffff81119043 ffff880043073838 ffff880043073838 ffff88003e197b98
[57600.291820]  ffffe8ffffcb46c0 ffff88003e197360 0000000000000286 ffff880043073968
[57600.299254] Call Trace:
[57600.301698]  [<ffffffff8114ee35>] ? cache_flusharray+0x35/0xe0
[57600.307523]  [<ffffffff81119043>] ? __page_cache_release+0x23/0x110
[57600.313779]  [<ffffffff8114eb53>] kmem_cache_free+0x63/0xc0
[57600.319344]  [<ffffffff81579942>] drop_one_stripe+0x62/0x90
[57600.324915]  [<ffffffff81579b5b>] raid5_cache_scan+0x8b/0xb0
[57600.330563]  [<ffffffff8111b98a>] shrink_slab.part.36+0x19a/0x250
[57600.336650]  [<ffffffff8111e38c>] shrink_zone+0x23c/0x250
[57600.342039]  [<ffffffff8111e4f3>] do_try_to_free_pages+0x153/0x420
[57600.348210]  [<ffffffff8111e851>] try_to_free_pages+0x91/0xa0
[57600.353959]  [<ffffffff811145b1>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4d1/0x8b0
[57600.360303]  [<ffffffff8157a30b>] check_reshape+0x62b/0x770
[57600.365866]  [<ffffffff8157a4a5>] raid5_check_reshape+0x55/0xa0
[57600.371778]  [<ffffffff81583df7>] update_raid_disks+0xc7/0x110
[57600.377604]  [<ffffffff81592b73>] md_ioctl+0xd83/0x1b10
[57600.382827]  [<ffffffff81385380>] blkdev_ioctl+0x170/0x690
[57600.388307]  [<ffffffff81195238>] block_ioctl+0x38/0x40
[57600.393525]  [<ffffffff811731c5>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2b5/0x480
[57600.399010]  [<ffffffff8115e07b>] ? vfs_write+0x14b/0x1f0
[57600.404400]  [<ffffffff811733cc>] SyS_ioctl+0x3c/0x70
[57600.409447]  [<ffffffff81a6ad97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
[57600.415875] Code: 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 e5 8b 07 85 c0 74 04 31 c0 5d c3 ba 01 00 00 00 f0 0f b1 17 85 c0 75 ef b0 01 5d c3 90 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 <f0> 0f b1 17 85 c0 75 01 c3 55 89 c6 48 89 e5 e8 85 d1 63 ff 5d
[57600.435460] RIP  [<ffffffff81a6aa87>] _raw_spin_lock+0x7/0x20
[57600.441208]  RSP <ffff880043073810>
[57600.444690] CR2: 0000000000000000
[57600.448000] ---[ end trace cbc6b5cc4bf9831d ]---

The problem is that resize_stripes() releases new stripe_heads before assigning new
slab cache to conf->slab_cache. If the shrinker function raid5_cache_scan() gets called
after resize_stripes() starting releasing new stripes but right before new slab cache
being assigned, it is possible that these new stripe_heads will be freed with the old
slab_cache which was already been destoryed and that triggers this bug.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Yang <dennisyang@qnap.com>
Fixes: edbe83ab ("md/raid5: allow the stripe_cache to grow and shrink.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (4.1+)
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>