-
Mika Kuoppala authored
We have a timed release of a forcewake when using I915_READ/WRITE macros. wait_for() macro will go to quite long sleep if the first read doesn't satisfy the condition for successful exit. With these two interacting, it is possible that we lose the forcewake during the wait_for() and the subsequent read will reaquire forcewake. Further experiments with skl shows that when we lose forcewake, we lose the reset request we submitted. So reset request register is not power context saved. Grab forcewakes for all engines before starting the reset/request dance so that all requests stay valid for the duration of reset requisition across all the engines. v2: Add comment on power well sleeps. Wrap the reset handling under forcewake instead of just reset requests (Chris) Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92774 Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Tested-by: Tomi Sarvela <tomix.p.sarvela@intel.com> (v1, v2) Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446721898-1450-1-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.comSigned-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
99106bc1