-
Filipe Manana authored
An fsync, using the fast path, can race with a concurrent lockless direct IO write and end up logging a file extent item that points to an extent that wasn't written to yet. This is because the fast fsync path collects ordered extents into a local list and then collects all the new extent maps to log file extent items based on them, while the direct IO write path creates the new extent map before it creates the corresponding ordered extent (and submitting the respective bio(s)). So fix this by making the direct IO write path create ordered extents before the extent maps and make the fast fsync path collect any new ordered extents after it collects the extent maps. Note that making the fsync handler call inode_dio_wait() (after acquiring the inode's i_mutex) would not work and lead to a deadlock when doing AIO, as through AIO we end up in a path where the fsync handler is called (through dio_aio_complete_work() -> dio_complete() -> vfs_fsync_range()) before the inode's dio counter is decremented (inode_dio_wait() waits for this counter to have a value of zero). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
de0ee0ed