-
Rasmus Villemoes authored
When building this on a 64-bit platform gcc rightly warns that the error checking is broken (-ENOMEM stored in an u32 does not compare greater than (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO). Instead, change the ucc_fast_[tr]x_virtual_fifo_base_offset members to s32 and use an ordinary check-for-negative. Also, this avoids treating 0 as "this cannot have been returned from qe_muram_alloc() so don't free it". Reviewed-by: Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
c93c159a