Commit 006e84ee authored by Catalin Marinas's avatar Catalin Marinas Committed by Andi Kleen

[PATCH] x86-64: do not always end the stack trace with ULONG_MAX

It makes more sense to end the stack trace with ULONG_MAX only if
nr_entries < max_entries.  Otherwise, we lose one entry in the long stack
traces and cannot know whether the trace was complete or not.
Signed-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
parent 5558870b
......@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static void save_stack_address(void *data, unsigned long addr)
trace->skip--;
return;
}
if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries - 1)
if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = addr;
}
......@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ static struct stacktrace_ops save_stack_ops = {
void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace, struct task_struct *task)
{
dump_trace(task, NULL, NULL, &save_stack_ops, trace);
trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(save_stack_trace);
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment