Commit 12b25729 authored by Josh Poimboeuf's avatar Josh Poimboeuf Committed by Ingo Molnar

objtool: Fix validate_branch() return codes

The validate_branch() function should never return a negative value.
Errors are treated as warnings so that even if something goes wrong,
objtool does its best to generate ORC data for the rest of the file.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: baa41469 ("objtool: Implement stack validation 2.0")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/d86671cfde823b50477cd2f6f548dfe54871e24d.1502401017.git.jpoimboe@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 01651324
......@@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct instruction *first,
if (insn->alt_group && list_empty(&insn->alts)) {
WARN_FUNC("don't know how to handle branch to middle of alternative instruction group",
sec, insn->offset);
return -1;
return 1;
}
while (1) {
......@@ -1543,7 +1543,7 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct instruction *first,
if (func && insn->ignore) {
WARN_FUNC("BUG: why am I validating an ignored function?",
sec, insn->offset);
return -1;
return 1;
}
if (insn->visited) {
......@@ -1681,7 +1681,7 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct instruction *first,
case INSN_STACK:
if (update_insn_state(insn, &state))
return -1;
return 1;
break;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment