Commit 166ab6f0 authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf, sockmap: fix map elem deletion race with smap_stop_sock

The smap_start_sock() and smap_stop_sock() are each protected under
the sock->sk_callback_lock from their call-sites except in the case
of sock_map_delete_elem() where we drop the old socket from the map
slot. This is racy because the same sock could be part of multiple
sock maps, so we run smap_stop_sock() in parallel, and given at that
point psock->strp_enabled might be true on both CPUs, we might for
example wrongly restore the sk->sk_data_ready / sk->sk_write_space.
Therefore, hold the sock->sk_callback_lock as well on delete. Looks
like 2f857d04 ("bpf: sockmap, remove STRPARSER map_flags and add
multi-map support") had this right, but later on e9db4ef6 ("bpf:
sockhash fix omitted bucket lock in sock_close") removed it again
from delete leaving this smap_stop_sock() instance unprotected.

Fixes: e9db4ef6 ("bpf: sockhash fix omitted bucket lock in sock_close")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent d40b0116
......@@ -1786,8 +1786,11 @@ static int sock_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
if (!psock)
goto out;
if (psock->bpf_parse)
if (psock->bpf_parse) {
write_lock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
smap_stop_sock(psock, sock);
write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
}
smap_list_map_remove(psock, &stab->sock_map[k]);
smap_release_sock(psock, sock);
out:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment