Commit 171a515d authored by Masahiro Yamada's avatar Masahiro Yamada

kconfig: use T_WORD instead of T_VARIABLE for variables

There is no grammatical ambiguity by using T_WORD for variables.
The parser can distinguish variables from symbols from the context.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
parent c3d22871
......@@ -109,13 +109,13 @@ n [A-Za-z0-9_-]
}
alloc_string(yytext, yyleng);
yylval.string = text;
return T_VARIABLE;
return T_WORD;
}
({n}|$)+ {
/* this token includes at least one '$' */
yylval.string = expand_token(yytext, yyleng);
if (strlen(yylval.string))
return T_VARIABLE;
return T_WORD;
free(yylval.string);
}
"=" { BEGIN(ASSIGN_VAL); return T_EQUAL; }
......
......@@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ static struct menu *current_menu, *current_entry;
%token T_STRING
%token T_TRISTATE
%token T_EOL
%token <string> T_VARIABLE
%token <string> T_ASSIGN_VAL
%left T_OR
......@@ -480,7 +479,7 @@ word_opt: /* empty */ { $$ = NULL; }
/* assignment statement */
assignment_stmt: T_VARIABLE assign_op assign_val T_EOL { variable_add($1, $3, $2); free($1); free($3); }
assignment_stmt: T_WORD assign_op assign_val T_EOL { variable_add($1, $3, $2); free($1); free($3); }
assign_op:
T_EQUAL { $$ = VAR_RECURSIVE; }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment