Commit 172c85dd authored by J. Bruce Fields's avatar J. Bruce Fields

nfsd4: treat more recall errors as failures

If a recall fails for some unexpected reason, instead of ignoring it and
treating it like a success, it's safer to treat it as a failure,
preventing further delgation grants and returning CB_PATH_DOWN.

Also put put switches in a (two me) more logical order, with normal case
first.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
parent 378b7d37
......@@ -667,7 +667,14 @@ static void nfsd4_cb_recall_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
}
switch (task->tk_status) {
case -EIO:
case 0:
return;
case -EBADHANDLE:
case -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID:
/* Race: client probably got cb_recall
* before open reply granting delegation */
break;
default:
/* Network partition? */
atomic_set(&clp->cl_cb_set, 0);
warn_no_callback_path(clp, task->tk_status);
......@@ -676,14 +683,6 @@ static void nfsd4_cb_recall_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
nfsd4_cb_recall(dp);
return;
}
case -EBADHANDLE:
case -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID:
/* Race: client probably got cb_recall
* before open reply granting delegation */
break;
default:
/* success, or error we can't handle */
return;
}
if (dp->dl_retries--) {
rpc_delay(task, 2*HZ);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment