Commit 17b692f6 authored by Gu Zheng's avatar Gu Zheng Committed by Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: use spinlock rather than mutex for better speed

With the 2 previous changes, all the long time operations are moved out
of the protection region, so here we can use spinlock rather than mutex
(orphan_inode_mutex) for lower overhead.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
parent c1ef3725
......@@ -196,22 +196,22 @@ int acquire_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
int err = 0;
mutex_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
if (unlikely(sbi->n_orphans >= sbi->max_orphans))
err = -ENOSPC;
else
sbi->n_orphans++;
mutex_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
return err;
}
void release_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
mutex_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
f2fs_bug_on(sbi->n_orphans == 0);
sbi->n_orphans--;
mutex_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
}
void add_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
......@@ -222,12 +222,12 @@ void add_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
new = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(orphan_entry_slab, GFP_ATOMIC);
new->ino = ino;
mutex_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
head = &sbi->orphan_inode_list;
list_for_each(this, head) {
orphan = list_entry(this, struct orphan_inode_entry, list);
if (orphan->ino == ino) {
mutex_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
kmem_cache_free(orphan_entry_slab, new);
return;
}
......@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ void add_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
list_add(&new->list, this->prev);
else
list_add_tail(&new->list, head);
mutex_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
}
void remove_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
......@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ void remove_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
struct list_head *head;
struct orphan_inode_entry *orphan;
mutex_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
head = &sbi->orphan_inode_list;
list_for_each_entry(orphan, head, list) {
if (orphan->ino == ino) {
......@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ void remove_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
break;
}
}
mutex_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
}
static void recover_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
......@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static void write_orphan_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t start_blk)
pages[index] = grab_meta_page(sbi, start_blk + index);
index = 1;
mutex_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
head = &sbi->orphan_inode_list;
/* loop for each orphan inode entry and write them in Jornal block */
......@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void write_orphan_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t start_blk)
f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
}
mutex_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_unlock(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
}
static struct page *validate_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
......@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ void write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool is_umount)
void init_orphan_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
mutex_init(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
spin_lock_init(&sbi->orphan_inode_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->orphan_inode_list);
sbi->n_orphans = 0;
/*
......
......@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
/* for orphan inode management */
struct list_head orphan_inode_list; /* orphan inode list */
struct mutex orphan_inode_mutex; /* for orphan inode list */
spinlock_t orphan_inode_lock; /* for orphan inode list */
unsigned int n_orphans; /* # of orphan inodes */
unsigned int max_orphans; /* max orphan inodes */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment