Commit 1c57b8f0 authored by Thinh Nguyen's avatar Thinh Nguyen Committed by Ben Hutchings

usb: dwc3: gadget: Prevent losing events in event cache

commit d325a1de upstream.

The dwc3 driver can overwite its previous events if its top-half IRQ
handler (TH) gets invoked again before processing the events in the
cache. We see this as a hang in the file transfer and the host will
attempt to reset the device. TH gets the event count and deasserts the
interrupt line by writing DWC3_GEVNTSIZ_INTMASK to DWC3_GEVNTSIZ. If
there's a new event coming between reading the event count and interrupt
deassertion, dwc3 will lose previous pending events. More generally, we
will see 0 event count, which should not affect anything.

This shouldn't be possible in the current dwc3 implementation. However,
through testing and reading the PCIe trace, the TH occasionally still
gets invoked one more time after HW interrupt deassertion. (With PCIe
legacy interrupts, TH is called repeatedly as long as the interrupt line
is asserted). We suspect that there is a small detection delay in the
SW.

To avoid this issue, Check DWC3_EVENT_PENDING flag to determine if the
events are processed in the bottom-half IRQ handler. If not, return
IRQ_HANDLED and don't process new event.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThinh Nguyen <thinhn@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFelipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
parent f93cbcb9
......@@ -2761,6 +2761,15 @@ static irqreturn_t dwc3_check_event_buf(struct dwc3 *dwc, u32 buf)
evt = dwc->ev_buffs[buf];
/*
* With PCIe legacy interrupt, test shows that top-half irq handler can
* be called again after HW interrupt deassertion. Check if bottom-half
* irq event handler completes before caching new event to prevent
* losing events.
*/
if (evt->flags & DWC3_EVENT_PENDING)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
count = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT(buf));
count &= DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_MASK;
if (!count)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment