Commit 22f614bc authored by Ming Lei's avatar Ming Lei Committed by Jens Axboe

blk-mq: fix blk_mq_all_tag_iter

blk_mq_all_tag_iter() is added to iterate all requests, so we should
fetch the request from ->static_rqs][] instead of ->rqs[] which is for
holding in-flight request only.

Fix it by adding flag of BT_TAG_ITER_STATIC_RQS.

Fixes: bf0beec0 ("blk-mq: drain I/O when all CPUs in a hctx are offline")
Signed-off-by: default avatarMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Tested-by: default avatarJohn Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent d94ecfc3
......@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ struct bt_tags_iter_data {
#define BT_TAG_ITER_RESERVED (1 << 0)
#define BT_TAG_ITER_STARTED (1 << 1)
#define BT_TAG_ITER_STATIC_RQS (1 << 2)
static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
{
......@@ -309,9 +310,12 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
/*
* We can hit rq == NULL here, because the tagging functions
* test and set the bit before assining ->rqs[].
* test and set the bit before assigning ->rqs[].
*/
rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
if (iter_data->flags & BT_TAG_ITER_STATIC_RQS)
rq = tags->static_rqs[bitnr];
else
rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
if (!rq)
return true;
if ((iter_data->flags & BT_TAG_ITER_STARTED) &&
......@@ -366,11 +370,13 @@ static void __blk_mq_all_tag_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
* indicates whether or not @rq is a reserved request. Return
* true to continue iterating tags, false to stop.
* @priv: Will be passed as second argument to @fn.
*
* Caller has to pass the tag map from which requests are allocated.
*/
void blk_mq_all_tag_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, busy_tag_iter_fn *fn,
void *priv)
{
return __blk_mq_all_tag_iter(tags, fn, priv, 0);
return __blk_mq_all_tag_iter(tags, fn, priv, BT_TAG_ITER_STATIC_RQS);
}
/**
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment