Commit 284b94be authored by Ming Lei's avatar Ming Lei Committed by Jens Axboe

blk-mq: move lockdep_assert_held() into elevator_exit

Commit c48dac13 ("block: don't hold q->sysfs_lock in elevator_init_mq")
removes q->sysfs_lock from elevator_init_mq(), but forgot to deal with
lockdep_assert_held() called in blk_mq_sched_free_requests() which is
run in failure path of elevator_init_mq().

blk_mq_sched_free_requests() is called in the following 3 functions:

	elevator_init_mq()
	elevator_exit()
	blk_cleanup_queue()

In blk_cleanup_queue(), blk_mq_sched_free_requests() is followed exactly
by 'mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock)'.

So moving the lockdep_assert_held() from blk_mq_sched_free_requests()
into elevator_exit() for fixing the report by syzbot.

Reported-by: syzbot+da3b7677bb913dc1b737@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixed: c48dac13 ("block: don't hold q->sysfs_lock in elevator_init_mq")
Reviewed-by: default avatarBart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDamien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent f41def39
......@@ -555,8 +555,6 @@ void blk_mq_sched_free_requests(struct request_queue *q)
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
int i;
lockdep_assert_held(&q->sysfs_lock);
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
if (hctx->sched_tags)
blk_mq_free_rqs(q->tag_set, hctx->sched_tags, i);
......
......@@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ void elv_unregister_queue(struct request_queue *q);
static inline void elevator_exit(struct request_queue *q,
struct elevator_queue *e)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&q->sysfs_lock);
blk_mq_sched_free_requests(q);
__elevator_exit(q, e);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment