Commit 30bf4cdd authored by David Mosberger's avatar David Mosberger Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] signal-race-fix: ia64

It looks fine to me, except that I decided to play chicken as far as the
give_sigsegv update of sa_handler is concerned.

Arun, I hope I got the ia32 emulation parts right, but you may want to
double-check.

The patch seems to work fine as far as I have tested.  I'm seeing some
oddity in context-switch overhead and pipe latency as reported by LMbench,
but I suspect that's due to another change that happened somewhere between
2.6.5-rc1 and Linus' bk tree as of this morning.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 2f66cc42
/*
* Architecture-specific signal handling support.
*
* Copyright (C) 1999-2003 Hewlett-Packard Co
* Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Hewlett-Packard Co
* David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
*
* Derived from i386 and Alpha versions.
......@@ -351,6 +351,36 @@ rbs_on_sig_stack (unsigned long bsp)
return (bsp - current->sas_ss_sp < current->sas_ss_size);
}
static long
force_sigsegv_info (int sig, void *addr)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct siginfo si;
if (sig == SIGSEGV) {
/*
* Acquiring siglock around the sa_handler-update is almost
* certainly overkill, but this isn't a
* performance-critical path and I'd rather play it safe
* here than having to debug a nasty race if and when
* something changes in kernel/signal.c that would make it
* no longer safe to modify sa_handler without holding the
* lock.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&current->sighand->siglock, flags);
current->sighand->action[sig - 1].sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&current->sighand->siglock, flags);
}
si.si_signo = SIGSEGV;
si.si_errno = 0;
si.si_code = SI_KERNEL;
si.si_pid = current->pid;
si.si_uid = current->uid;
si.si_addr = addr;
force_sig_info(SIGSEGV, &si, current);
return 0;
}
static long
setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *set,
struct sigscratch *scr)
......@@ -358,7 +388,6 @@ setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *set,
extern char __kernel_sigtramp[];
unsigned long tramp_addr, new_rbs = 0;
struct sigframe *frame;
struct siginfo si;
long err;
frame = (void *) scr->pt.r12;
......@@ -377,7 +406,7 @@ setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *set,
frame = (void *) frame - ((sizeof(*frame) + STACK_ALIGN - 1) & ~(STACK_ALIGN - 1));
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
goto give_sigsegv;
return force_sigsegv_info(sig, frame);
err = __put_user(sig, &frame->arg0);
err |= __put_user(&frame->info, &frame->arg1);
......@@ -393,8 +422,8 @@ setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *set,
err |= __put_user(sas_ss_flags(scr->pt.r12), &frame->sc.sc_stack.ss_flags);
err |= setup_sigcontext(&frame->sc, set, scr);
if (err)
goto give_sigsegv;
if (unlikely(err))
return force_sigsegv_info(sig, frame);
scr->pt.r12 = (unsigned long) frame - 16; /* new stack pointer */
scr->pt.ar_fpsr = FPSR_DEFAULT; /* reset fpsr for signal handler */
......@@ -422,18 +451,6 @@ setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *set,
current->comm, current->pid, sig, scr->pt.r12, frame->sc.sc_ip, frame->handler);
#endif
return 1;
give_sigsegv:
if (sig == SIGSEGV)
ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
si.si_signo = SIGSEGV;
si.si_errno = 0;
si.si_code = SI_KERNEL;
si.si_pid = current->pid;
si.si_uid = current->uid;
si.si_addr = frame;
force_sig_info(SIGSEGV, &si, current);
return 0;
}
static long
......@@ -449,9 +466,6 @@ handle_signal (unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigse
if (!setup_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, scr))
return 0;
if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONESHOT)
ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
{
......@@ -471,7 +485,7 @@ handle_signal (unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigse
long
ia64_do_signal (sigset_t *oldset, struct sigscratch *scr, long in_syscall)
{
struct k_sigaction *ka;
struct k_sigaction ka;
siginfo_t info;
long restart = in_syscall;
long errno = scr->pt.r8;
......@@ -493,7 +507,7 @@ ia64_do_signal (sigset_t *oldset, struct sigscratch *scr, long in_syscall)
* need to push through a forced SIGSEGV.
*/
while (1) {
int signr = get_signal_to_deliver(&info, &scr->pt, NULL);
int signr = get_signal_to_deliver(&info, &ka, &scr->pt, NULL);
/*
* get_signal_to_deliver() may have run a debugger (via notify_parent())
......@@ -520,8 +534,6 @@ ia64_do_signal (sigset_t *oldset, struct sigscratch *scr, long in_syscall)
if (signr <= 0)
break;
ka = &current->sighand->action[signr - 1];
if (unlikely(restart)) {
switch (errno) {
case ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK:
......@@ -531,7 +543,7 @@ ia64_do_signal (sigset_t *oldset, struct sigscratch *scr, long in_syscall)
break;
case ERESTARTSYS:
if ((ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTART) == 0) {
if ((ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTART) == 0) {
scr->pt.r8 = ERR_CODE(EINTR);
/* note: scr->pt.r10 is already -1 */
break;
......@@ -550,7 +562,7 @@ ia64_do_signal (sigset_t *oldset, struct sigscratch *scr, long in_syscall)
* Whee! Actually deliver the signal. If the delivery failed, we need to
* continue to iterate in this loop so we can deliver the SIGSEGV...
*/
if (handle_signal(signr, ka, &info, oldset, scr))
if (handle_signal(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, scr))
return 1;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment