Commit 404b8f5a authored by Jens Axboe's avatar Jens Axboe

block: cleanup kick/queued handling

Now that blk_flush_queue_rq() always returns false, we can
remove that return value. That bubbles through the stack,
allowing us to remove a bunch of state tracking around it.
Tested-by: default avatarMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 7e992f84
......@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ enum {
FLUSH_PENDING_TIMEOUT = 5 * HZ,
};
static bool blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q,
static void blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q,
struct blk_flush_queue *fq, unsigned int flags);
static unsigned int blk_flush_policy(unsigned long fflags, struct request *rq)
......@@ -132,10 +132,9 @@ static void blk_flush_restore_request(struct request *rq)
rq->end_io = rq->flush.saved_end_io;
}
static bool blk_flush_queue_rq(struct request *rq, bool add_front)
static void blk_flush_queue_rq(struct request *rq, bool add_front)
{
blk_mq_add_to_requeue_list(rq, add_front, true);
return false;
}
/**
......@@ -154,13 +153,12 @@ static bool blk_flush_queue_rq(struct request *rq, bool add_front)
* RETURNS:
* %true if requests were added to the dispatch queue, %false otherwise.
*/
static bool blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
static void blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
struct blk_flush_queue *fq,
unsigned int seq, blk_status_t error)
{
struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
struct list_head *pending = &fq->flush_queue[fq->flush_pending_idx];
bool queued = false, kicked;
unsigned int cmd_flags;
BUG_ON(rq->flush.seq & seq);
......@@ -183,7 +181,7 @@ static bool blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
case REQ_FSEQ_DATA:
list_move_tail(&rq->flush.list, &fq->flush_data_in_flight);
queued = blk_flush_queue_rq(rq, true);
blk_flush_queue_rq(rq, true);
break;
case REQ_FSEQ_DONE:
......@@ -203,15 +201,13 @@ static bool blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
BUG();
}
kicked = blk_kick_flush(q, fq, cmd_flags);
return kicked | queued;
blk_kick_flush(q, fq, cmd_flags);
}
static void flush_end_io(struct request *flush_rq, blk_status_t error)
{
struct request_queue *q = flush_rq->q;
struct list_head *running;
bool queued = false;
struct request *rq, *n;
unsigned long flags = 0;
struct blk_flush_queue *fq = blk_get_flush_queue(q, flush_rq->mq_ctx);
......@@ -239,7 +235,7 @@ static void flush_end_io(struct request *flush_rq, blk_status_t error)
unsigned int seq = blk_flush_cur_seq(rq);
BUG_ON(seq != REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH && seq != REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH);
queued |= blk_flush_complete_seq(rq, fq, seq, error);
blk_flush_complete_seq(rq, fq, seq, error);
}
fq->flush_queue_delayed = 0;
......@@ -258,10 +254,8 @@ static void flush_end_io(struct request *flush_rq, blk_status_t error)
* CONTEXT:
* spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock or fq->mq_flush_lock)
*
* RETURNS:
* %true if flush was issued, %false otherwise.
*/
static bool blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_flush_queue *fq,
static void blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_flush_queue *fq,
unsigned int flags)
{
struct list_head *pending = &fq->flush_queue[fq->flush_pending_idx];
......@@ -272,7 +266,7 @@ static bool blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_flush_queue *fq,
/* C1 described at the top of this file */
if (fq->flush_pending_idx != fq->flush_running_idx || list_empty(pending))
return false;
return;
/* C2 and C3
*
......@@ -284,7 +278,7 @@ static bool blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_flush_queue *fq,
!(q->mq_ops && q->elevator) &&
time_before(jiffies,
fq->flush_pending_since + FLUSH_PENDING_TIMEOUT))
return false;
return;
/*
* Issue flush and toggle pending_idx. This makes pending_idx
......@@ -319,7 +313,7 @@ static bool blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_flush_queue *fq,
flush_rq->rq_disk = first_rq->rq_disk;
flush_rq->end_io = flush_end_io;
return blk_flush_queue_rq(flush_rq, false);
blk_flush_queue_rq(flush_rq, false);
}
static void mq_flush_data_end_io(struct request *rq, blk_status_t error)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment