Commit 42fa566b authored by Davidlohr Bueso's avatar Davidlohr Bueso Committed by Ingo Molnar

locking/mutexes: Document quick lock release when unlocking

When unlocking, we always want to reach the slowpath with the lock's counter
indicating it is unlocked. -- as returned by the asm fastpath call or by
explicitly setting it. While doing so, at least in theory, we can optimize
and allow faster lock stealing.

When unlocking, we always want to reach the slowpath with the lock's counter
indicating it is unlocked. -- as returned by the asm fastpath call or by
explicitly setting it. While doing so, at least in theory, we can optimize
and allow faster lock stealing.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: jason.low2@hp.com
Cc: aswin@hp.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1406752916-3341-2-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 242489cf
......@@ -684,9 +684,16 @@ __mutex_unlock_common_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, int nested)
unsigned long flags;
/*
* some architectures leave the lock unlocked in the fastpath failure
* As a performance measurement, release the lock before doing other
* wakeup related duties to follow. This allows other tasks to acquire
* the lock sooner, while still handling cleanups in past unlock calls.
* This can be done as we do not enforce strict equivalence between the
* mutex counter and wait_list.
*
*
* Some architectures leave the lock unlocked in the fastpath failure
* case, others need to leave it locked. In the later case we have to
* unlock it here
* unlock it here - as the lock counter is currently 0 or negative.
*/
if (__mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock())
atomic_set(&lock->count, 1);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment