Commit 43948f50 authored by Masami Hiramatsu's avatar Masami Hiramatsu Committed by Ingo Molnar

kprobes: Remove redundant text_mutex lock in optimize

Remove text_mutex locking in optimize_all_kprobes, because
this function doesn't modify text. It simply queues probes on
optimization list for kprobe_optimizer worker thread.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMasami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20101025131801.19160.70939.stgit@ltc236.sdl.hitachi.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 2c78ffec
......@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ static struct hlist_head kretprobe_inst_table[KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE];
/* NOTE: change this value only with kprobe_mutex held */
static bool kprobes_all_disarmed;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(kprobe_mutex); /* Protects kprobe_table */
/* This protects kprobe_table and optimizing_list */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(kprobe_mutex);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, kprobe_instance) = NULL;
static struct {
spinlock_t lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
......@@ -595,6 +596,7 @@ static __kprobes void try_to_optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
/* This should be called with kprobe_mutex locked */
static void __kprobes optimize_all_kprobes(void)
{
struct hlist_head *head;
......@@ -607,17 +609,16 @@ static void __kprobes optimize_all_kprobes(void)
return;
kprobes_allow_optimization = true;
mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
head = &kprobe_table[i];
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, node, head, hlist)
if (!kprobe_disabled(p))
optimize_kprobe(p);
}
mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally optimized\n");
}
/* This should be called with kprobe_mutex locked */
static void __kprobes unoptimize_all_kprobes(void)
{
struct hlist_head *head;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment