Commit 442df042 authored by Marcelo Ricardo Leitner's avatar Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

sctp: fix missing wake ups in some situations


[ Upstream commit 7906b00f ]

Commit fb586f25 ("sctp: delay calls to sk_data_ready() as much as
possible") minimized the number of wake ups that are triggered in case
the association receives a packet with multiple data chunks on it and/or
when io_events are enabled and then commit 0970f5b3 ("sctp: signal
sk_data_ready earlier on data chunks reception") moved the wake up to as
soon as possible. It thus relies on the state machine running later to
clean the flag that the event was already generated.

The issue is that there are 2 call paths that calls
sctp_ulpq_tail_event() outside of the state machine, causing the flag to
linger and possibly omitting a needed wake up in the sequence.

One of the call paths is when enabling SCTP_SENDER_DRY_EVENTS via
setsockopt(SCTP_EVENTS), as noticed by Harald Welte. The other is when
partial reliability triggers removal of chunks from the send queue when
the application calls sendmsg().

This commit fixes it by not setting the flag in case the socket is not
owned by the user, as it won't be cleaned later. This works for
user-initiated calls and also for rx path processing.

Fixes: fb586f25 ("sctp: delay calls to sk_data_ready() as much as possible")
Reported-by: default avatarHarald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent aa02286a
......@@ -265,7 +265,8 @@ int sctp_ulpq_tail_event(struct sctp_ulpq *ulpq, struct sctp_ulpevent *event)
sctp_ulpq_clear_pd(ulpq);
if (queue == &sk->sk_receive_queue && !sp->data_ready_signalled) {
sp->data_ready_signalled = 1;
if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
sp->data_ready_signalled = 1;
sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
}
return 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment