Commit 45b79749 authored by Steven Rostedt's avatar Steven Rostedt Committed by Ingo Molnar

trace: consolidate unlikely and likely profiler

Impact: clean up to make one profiler of like and unlikely tracer

The likely and unlikely profiler prints out the file and line numbers
of the annotated branches that it is profiling. It shows the number
of times it was correct or incorrect in its guess. Having two
different files or sections for that matter to tell us if it was a
likely or unlikely is pretty pointless. We really only care if
it was correct or not.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 42f565e1
......@@ -46,12 +46,9 @@
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING
#define LIKELY_PROFILE() VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__start_likely_profile) = .; \
*(_ftrace_likely) \
VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__stop_likely_profile) = .; \
VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__start_unlikely_profile) = .; \
*(_ftrace_unlikely) \
VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__stop_unlikely_profile) = .;
#define LIKELY_PROFILE() VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__start_annotated_branch_profile) = .; \
*(_ftrace_annotated_branch) \
VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__stop_annotated_branch_profile) = .;
#else
#define LIKELY_PROFILE()
#endif
......
......@@ -77,32 +77,18 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
#define likely_notrace(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
#define unlikely_notrace(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
#define likely_check(x) ({ \
#define __branch_check__(x, expect) ({ \
int ______r; \
static struct ftrace_branch_data \
__attribute__((__aligned__(4))) \
__attribute__((section("_ftrace_likely"))) \
__attribute__((section("_ftrace_annotated_branch"))) \
______f = { \
.func = __func__, \
.file = __FILE__, \
.line = __LINE__, \
}; \
______r = likely_notrace(x); \
ftrace_likely_update(&______f, ______r, 1); \
______r; \
})
#define unlikely_check(x) ({ \
int ______r; \
static struct ftrace_branch_data \
__attribute__((__aligned__(4))) \
__attribute__((section("_ftrace_unlikely"))) \
______f = { \
.func = __func__, \
.file = __FILE__, \
.line = __LINE__, \
}; \
______r = unlikely_notrace(x); \
ftrace_likely_update(&______f, ______r, 0); \
ftrace_likely_update(&______f, ______r, expect); \
______r; \
})
......@@ -112,10 +98,10 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
* written by Daniel Walker.
*/
# ifndef likely
# define likely(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? !!(x) : likely_check(x))
# define likely(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? !!(x) : __branch_check__(x, 1))
# endif
# ifndef unlikely
# define unlikely(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? !!(x) : unlikely_check(x))
# define unlikely(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? !!(x) : __branch_check__(x, 0))
# endif
#else
# define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
......
......@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ config TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING
This tracer profiles all the the likely and unlikely macros
in the kernel. It will display the results in:
/debugfs/tracing/profile_likely
/debugfs/tracing/profile_unlikely
/debugfs/tracing/profile_annotated_branch
Note: this will add a significant overhead, only turn this
on if you need to profile the system's use of these macros.
......
......@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static struct seq_operations tracing_likely_seq_ops = {
.show = t_show,
};
static int tracing_likely_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
static int tracing_branch_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
int ret;
......@@ -274,25 +274,18 @@ static int tracing_likely_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
return ret;
}
static struct file_operations tracing_likely_fops = {
.open = tracing_likely_open,
static const struct file_operations tracing_branch_fops = {
.open = tracing_branch_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
};
extern unsigned long __start_likely_profile[];
extern unsigned long __stop_likely_profile[];
extern unsigned long __start_unlikely_profile[];
extern unsigned long __stop_unlikely_profile[];
extern unsigned long __start_annotated_branch_profile[];
extern unsigned long __stop_annotated_branch_profile[];
static struct ftrace_pointer ftrace_likely_pos = {
.start = __start_likely_profile,
.stop = __stop_likely_profile,
};
static struct ftrace_pointer ftrace_unlikely_pos = {
.start = __start_unlikely_profile,
.stop = __stop_unlikely_profile,
static const struct ftrace_pointer ftrace_annotated_branch_pos = {
.start = __start_annotated_branch_profile,
.stop = __stop_annotated_branch_profile,
};
static __init int ftrace_branch_init(void)
......@@ -302,18 +295,12 @@ static __init int ftrace_branch_init(void)
d_tracer = tracing_init_dentry();
entry = debugfs_create_file("profile_likely", 0444, d_tracer,
&ftrace_likely_pos,
&tracing_likely_fops);
if (!entry)
pr_warning("Could not create debugfs 'profile_likely' entry\n");
entry = debugfs_create_file("profile_unlikely", 0444, d_tracer,
&ftrace_unlikely_pos,
&tracing_likely_fops);
entry = debugfs_create_file("profile_annotated_branch", 0444, d_tracer,
&ftrace_annotated_branch_pos,
&tracing_branch_fops);
if (!entry)
pr_warning("Could not create debugfs"
" 'profile_unlikely' entry\n");
pr_warning("Could not create debugfs "
"'profile_annotatet_branch' entry\n");
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment