docs/arm64: cpu-feature-registers: Rewrite bitfields that don't follow [e, s]
Commit "docs/arm64: cpu-feature-registers: Documents missing visible fields" added bitfields following the convention [s, e]. However, the documentation is following [s, e] and so does the Arm ARM. Rewrite the bitfields to match the format [s, e]. Fixes: a8613e70 ("docs/arm64: cpu-feature-registers: Documents missing visible fields") Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment