Commit 47b7aee1 authored by Valentin Schneider's avatar Valentin Schneider Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/fair: Clean up load_balance() condition

The alignment of the condition is off, clean that up.

Also, logical operators have lower precedence than bitwise/relational
operators, so remove one layer of parentheses to make the condition a
bit simpler to follow.
Signed-off-by: default avatarValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537974727-30788-1-git-send-email-valentin.schneider@arm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 40fa3780
......@@ -8877,9 +8877,9 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
out_one_pinned:
/* tune up the balancing interval */
if (((env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED) &&
sd->balance_interval < MAX_PINNED_INTERVAL) ||
(sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval))
if ((env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED &&
sd->balance_interval < MAX_PINNED_INTERVAL) ||
sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval)
sd->balance_interval *= 2;
ld_moved = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment