Commit 506ed6b5 authored by Andi Kleen's avatar Andi Kleen Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86, intel: Output microcode revision in /proc/cpuinfo

I got a request to make it easier to determine the microcode
update level on Intel CPUs. This patch adds a new "microcode"
field to /proc/cpuinfo.

The microcode level is also outputed on fatal machine checks
together with the other CPUID model information.

I removed the respective code from the microcode update driver,
it just reads the field from cpu_data. Also when the microcode
is updated it fills in the new values too.

I had to add a memory barrier to native_cpuid to prevent it
being optimized away when the result is not used.

This turns out to clean up further code which already got this
information manually. This is done in followon patches.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1318466795-7393-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 70989449
......@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
/* Index into per_cpu list: */
u16 cpu_index;
#endif
u32 microcode;
} __attribute__((__aligned__(SMP_CACHE_BYTES)));
#define X86_VENDOR_INTEL 0
......@@ -179,7 +180,8 @@ static inline void native_cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
"=b" (*ebx),
"=c" (*ecx),
"=d" (*edx)
: "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx));
: "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx)
: "memory");
}
static inline void load_cr3(pgd_t *pgdir)
......
......@@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
(c->x86 == 0x6 && c->x86_model >= 0x0e))
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
if (c->x86 >= 6 && !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IA64)) {
unsigned lower_word;
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
/* Required by the SDM */
sync_core();
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, lower_word, c->microcode);
}
/*
* Atom erratum AAE44/AAF40/AAG38/AAH41:
*
......
......@@ -217,8 +217,13 @@ static void print_mce(struct mce *m)
pr_cont("MISC %llx ", m->misc);
pr_cont("\n");
pr_emerg(HW_ERR "PROCESSOR %u:%x TIME %llu SOCKET %u APIC %x\n",
m->cpuvendor, m->cpuid, m->time, m->socketid, m->apicid);
/*
* Note this output is parsed by external tools and old fields
* should not be changed.
*/
pr_emerg(HW_ERR "PROCESSOR %u:%x TIME %llu SOCKET %u APIC %x microcode %u\n",
m->cpuvendor, m->cpuid, m->time, m->socketid, m->apicid,
cpu_data(m->extcpu).microcode);
/*
* Print out human-readable details about the MCE error,
......
......@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
seq_printf(m, "stepping\t: %d\n", c->x86_mask);
else
seq_printf(m, "stepping\t: unknown\n");
if (c->microcode)
seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: %u\n", c->microcode);
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
......
......@@ -161,12 +161,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
csig->pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
}
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
/* see notes above for revision 1.07. Apparent chip bug */
sync_core();
/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], csig->rev);
csig->rev = c->microcode;
pr_info("CPU%d sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
cpu_num, csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
......@@ -299,9 +294,9 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
unsigned int val[2];
int cpu_num;
int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
mc_intel = uci->mc;
......@@ -317,7 +312,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
(unsigned long) mc_intel->bits >> 16 >> 16);
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
/* see notes above for revision 1.07. Apparent chip bug */
/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
sync_core();
/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
......@@ -335,6 +330,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
(mc_intel->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
c->microcode = val[1];
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment