Commit 548c3050 authored by Andy Lutomirski's avatar Andy Lutomirski Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/entry/64: Fix entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe() IRQ tracing

When I added entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe(), I left TRACE_IRQS_OFF
before it.  This means that users of entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe()
were responsible for invoking TRACE_IRQS_OFF, and the one and only
user (Xen, added in the same commit) got it wrong.

I think this would manifest as a warning if a Xen PV guest with
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y were used with context tracking.  (The
context tracking bit is to cause lockdep to get invoked before we
turn IRQs back on.)  I haven't tested that for real yet because I
can't get a kernel configured like that to boot at all on Xen PV.

Move TRACE_IRQS_OFF below the label.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 8a9949bc ("x86/xen/64: Rearrange the SYSCALL entries")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/9150aac013b7b95d62c2336751d5b6e91d2722aa.1511325444.git.luto@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 7b659ee3
......@@ -148,8 +148,6 @@ ENTRY(entry_SYSCALL_64)
movq %rsp, PER_CPU_VAR(rsp_scratch)
movq PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %rsp
TRACE_IRQS_OFF
/* Construct struct pt_regs on stack */
pushq $__USER_DS /* pt_regs->ss */
pushq PER_CPU_VAR(rsp_scratch) /* pt_regs->sp */
......@@ -170,6 +168,8 @@ GLOBAL(entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe)
sub $(6*8), %rsp /* pt_regs->bp, bx, r12-15 not saved */
UNWIND_HINT_REGS extra=0
TRACE_IRQS_OFF
/*
* If we need to do entry work or if we guess we'll need to do
* exit work, go straight to the slow path.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment