net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix style issues
This patch fixes 5 style problems reported by checkpatch: WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 24) #492: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:492: + if (phydev->link) + reg |= PORT_PCS_CTRL_LINK_UP; CHECK: Logical continuations should be on the previous line #1318: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:1318: + oldstate == PORT_CONTROL_STATE_FORWARDING) + && (state == PORT_CONTROL_STATE_DISABLED || CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided #1662: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:1662: + vlan->vid_begin = vlan->vid_end = next.vid; WARNING: line over 80 characters #2097: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:2097: + const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan, WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (16, 32) #2734: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:2734: + if (mv88e6xxx_6352_family(ps) || mv88e6xxx_6351_family(ps) || [...] + reg |= PORT_CONTROL_EGRESS_ADD_TAG; total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 2 checks, 3805 lines checked It also rebases and integrates changes sent by Ben Dooks [1]: The driver has a number of functions that are not exported or declared elsewhere, so make them static to avoid the following warnings from sparse: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:113:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_reg_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:167:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_reg_write' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:231:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_set_addr' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:367:6: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_ppu_state_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3157:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_phy_page_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3169:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_phy_page_write' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3583:26: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_switch_driver' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3621:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_probe' was not declared. Should it be static? [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/632708/Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment